ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Effect of Mass Reduction of 3D-Printed PLA on Load Transfer Capacity-A Circular Economy Perspective.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
(1) Background: Optimizing infill density in 3D-printed PLA parts reduces material usage, cost, and waste. This study examines mechanical behavior in the initial and hydration stages. The findings provide valuable data for numerical simulations and engineering applications in additive manufacturing. (2) Methods: PLA specimens were printed with infill densities of 100%, 75%, and 25%. Mechanical tests, including tensile and compression tests, and one-hour stress-relaxation at 2% strain were conducted. The digital image correlation method was used to obtain the strain fields on the samples' surface under tensile loading. Mechanical properties, including the elastic modulus, strength values, and Poisson's ratio, were assessed. Hydrolytic degradation effects over one month were also evaluated. (3) Results: Lowering the PLA infill density reduced the ultimate tensile strength (from 60.04 ± 2.24 MPa to 26.24 ± 0.77 MPa), Young's modulus (from 2645.05 ± 204.15 MPa to 1245.41 ± 83.79 MPa), compressive strength (from 26.59 ± 0.80 MPa to 21.83 ± 1.01 MPa), and Poisson's ratio (from 0.32 to 0.30). A 40% mass reduction (form 100% to 25% infill density) resulted in a 56% decrease in tensile strength and a 53% decrease in Young's modulus. A 31% mass reduction was observed for compression samples. Stress relaxation decreased significantly from 100% to 75% density, with further reductions having minimal impact. Hydrated samples showed no mechanical changes compared to baseline specimens. (4) Conclusions: Optimizing infill density in 3D-printed PLA parts helps to balance mechanical performance with material efficiency. The best mechanical properties are typically achieved with an infill density of 100%, but results show that decreasing the mass of the part by a reduction in infill density from 75% to 25% does not significantly affect the ability to transfer tensile and compression loads. PLA's biodegradability makes it a viable alternative to stable polymers. By minimizing material waste and enabling the efficient use of resources, additive manufacturing aligns with the principles of a closed-loop economy, supporting sustainable development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.