ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Experimental Study on the Preparation of Paste Filling Materials from Coal-Based Solid Wastes.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To reduce the cost of coal mine filling materials, a novel composite cementitious material was developed by utilizing coal-based solid waste materials, including fly ash, desulfurized gypsum, and carbide slag, along with cement and water as raw materials. Initially, a comprehensive analysis of the physical and chemical properties of each raw material was conducted. Subsequently, proportioning tests were systematically carried out using the single-variable method. During these tests, multiple crucial performance indicators were measured. Specifically, the fluidity and bleeding rate of the slurry were evaluated to assess its workability, while the compressive strength and chemically bound water content of the hardened sample were tested to determine its mechanical properties and hydration degree. Through in-depth analysis of the test results, the optimal formulation of the composite cementitious material was determined. In the basic group, the mass ratio of fly ash to desulfurized gypsum was set at 70:30. In the additional group, the carbide slag addition amount accounted for 20% of the total mass, the cement addition amount was 15%, and the water-cement ratio was fixed at 0.65. Under these optimal proportioning conditions, the composite cementitious material exhibited excellent performance: its fluidity ranged from 180 to 220 mm, the bleeding rate within 6 h was less than 5%, and the 28-day compressive strength reached 17.69 MPa. The newly developed composite cementitious material features good fluidity and high strength of the hardened sample, fully meeting the requirements for mine filling materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.