ArticleHealth research policy and systems2025
How can health be further integrated in urban development policymaking in the United Kingdom? A systems mapping approach.
Article in Health research policy and systems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn the United Kingdom the government's new health mission aims to reduce the burden on healthcare services by shifting from treating poor health to prevention. Delivering this requires action on health in policy arenas outside of the health sector such as urban development, as urban environments are key health determinants. However, change is challenging in complex and long-established policy systems and structures. Systems methods can enhance research into such contexts and demonstrate opportunities for delivering cross-cutting preventative health agendas.
methodsThis study aimed to enhance understanding of how health is integrated in urban development policymaking, and how to bring about change to support healthier development. It was undertaken over two stages. Firstly, a thematic analysis of data from interviews with 37 United Kingdom policy officials exploring urban development decision-making in central government. Secondly, the development of a causal loop diagram based on the variables and connections between them, identified in the interview data.
resultsAnalysis revealed how health is not well integrated in urban development policymaking. Through mapping 15 important influencing variables, we identified four main areas where change can be delivered: senior leadership on preventative health, responsibility in urban development teams for health, opportunities in urban development for health experts to promote ideas, and the capacity and capability of officials to act. Addressing any of the factors identified will likely have benefits, but it is by bringing change to multiple highlighted areas that health integration will be maximized.
conclusionsIf the United Kingdom Government's health mission is to be effective, policymakers must be empowered and incentivized to act on health in areas such as urban development. There is recent evidence of enhanced leadership on health prevention, but this must be supported in in several ways simultaneously, with increased funding, facilitating joined up working across sectors, and enhancing the use of tools and evidence to understand and promote health outcomes. By taking a systems approach this study adds value to existing understandings by going beyond isolated challenges and opportunities, to illustrate the connections between them and, therefore, how any changes are likely to have wider effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.