Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40731402›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2025

Testing the study protocol and interrater reliability of a new end-of-life wound assessment tool: a feasibility study.

Sharon Latimer, Rachel M Walker, Jayne Hewitt, Gillian Ray-Barruel, Joanie Shaw, Tracey Hunt, Brigid M Gillespie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sharon LatimerSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, and NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Wiser Wounds Care, Griffith University, Southport, QLD, Australia. s.latimer@griffith.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2704-150X
Rachel M WalkerCollege of Healthcare Sciences Academy, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6089-8225
Jayne HewittSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Southport, QLD, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6888-2666
Gillian Ray-BarruelSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8875-7523
Joanie ShawCancer, Blood Disorders, Specialist Palliative Care, Immunology & Sexual Health, Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, Southport, QLD, Australia.
Tracey HuntPatient Safety and Quality Clinical Nurse Consultant, Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, Southport, QLD, Australia.
Brigid M GillespieSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, and NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Wiser Wounds Care, Griffith University, Southport, QLD, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3186-5691

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSome dying individuals can develop skin injuries at the end-of-life (EOL) due to factors associated with the disease processes, aging or both. These EOL wounds, which include Kennedy terminal ulcers, Trombley-Brennan terminal tissue injuries, Skin Changes at Life's End and end-stage skin failure, have distinguishing features. Yet, they can appear similar to pressure injuries (PIs), making assessment difficult. Compounding this was the lack of clinical assessment tool for EOL wounds. In 2022, we conducted a modified Delphi panel to develop a new EOL wound assessment tool for use in dying adults and established the face and content validity of the items. The new tool does not differentiate between a PI and EOL wound; rather, it aids clinicians' assessment of EOL wound characteristics and suggests the development of a multidisciplinary management plan. The next step in the tool development is to determine its reliability. The aim of this study was to test the study protocol and interrater reliability of a new EOL wound assessment tool.

methodsThis feasibility study was conducted in dying hospitalised adult patients admitted to medical and palliative care units at three hospitals across southeast Queensland, Australia. We gathered quantitative data according to the study protocol including participant screening, recruitment, consent, data collection and interrater reliability. Our four research assistants (RAs) and an independent blinded outcome assessor were trained in the study protocol and use of the new EOL wound assessment tool. Using a pragmatic approach, patients with a new reported PI were screened for study eligibility. For recruited participants, clinical data, skin blanching, and a deidentified wound photograph were first collected. Next, the RAs used the new tool to assess the patient and the skin to determine the presence of an EOL wound (Yes/No). An off-site independent blinded outcome assessor accessed the participant research data and, using the new tool, undertook the same assessment as the RA. Frequencies and percentages were computed for the feasibility outcomes. Cohen's kappa statistic was calculated to determine the interrater reliability agreement.

resultsOver 20 months, 140 patients were screened, with 23 (16.4%) eligible for recruitment, exceeding our ≥ 10% target. Ten (43.5%) participants were recruited, which fell short of our ≥ 50% target, with study refusal and imminent death the reasons for non-recruitment. Among the 10 recruited study participants, 13 wounds were observed on the sacrum, coccyx, and lower extremities. The interrater reliability between the two assessors was moderate (n = 8/13; 61.5%), with disagreement on five wounds, all located on the heels and toes.

conclusionsAssessing for EOL wounds in dying patients is a clinical imperative. With minor study protocol adjustments, such as having two clinicians concurrently undertake independent wound assessment and only recruiting from palliative care units, conducting a larger multisite study testing the inter- and intrarater reliability of the new EOL wound assessment tool is feasible.

Indexed as

Terminal CareWounds and InjuriesAdultAgedDelphi TechniqueFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQueenslandReproducibility of ResultsHospice careKennedy terminal ulcerPalliative carePressure ulcerSkin assessmentSkin failure

Identifiers

PMID40731402
PMCPMC12309095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.