ArticleJournal of eating disorders2025
Childhood maltreatment and longitudinal trajectories of disordered eating behaviors: sociodemographic moderators and behavior-specific sensitivity analyses.
Article in Journal of eating disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveDisordered eating behaviors (DEBs) represent a significant public health issue, with childhood maltreatment emerging as a potential contributing factor. However, the longitudinal impact of maltreatment on the progression of disordered eating behaviors from adolescence to adulthood remains inadequately understood. This study aims to explore how childhood maltreatment influences the trajectory of disordered eating behaviors, focusing on potential moderating factors such as sociodemographic variables, race, and sex.
methodsData from Waves I-III of Add Health (ages 11-26) were used to assess DEB trajectories, with retrospective childhood maltreatment data collected in Wave IV. Repeated measures mixed-effects models accounted for intra-individual variability, adjusting for relevant covariates. Interaction effects between maltreatment subtypes and sociodemographic covariates (sex, race/ethnicity, income) were analyzed to examine how these intersections influenced DEB trajectories.
resultsAmong the 15,363,384 participants, 49.2% experienced childhood maltreatment. Adjusted models indicated significant increases in DEBs over time, particularly between Waves II and III (β = 19.9, p < 0.001). Although physical abuse (β = 1.88, p = 0.1330), verbal abuse (β = -0.67, p = 0.4529), and sexual abuse by a parent (β = 1.59, p = 0.4204) were not significant predictors of worsening behaviors, stratified analyses revealed that low-income individuals exposed to non-familial sexual abuse demonstrated the steepest worsening of DEBs (β = 26.5, p = 0.0048). Interaction effects revealed that Asian or Pacific Islander participants experiencing verbal abuse, and low-income individuals exposed to non-familial sexual abuse demonstrated pronounced worsening of DEBs. We observed significant sex differences: males exhibited higher levels of worsening behaviors over time (β = -10.8, p < 0.0001).
conclusionOur findings suggest that sociodemographic characteristics (sex, race, income) may moderate the persistence of DEBs, underscoring the need for trauma-informed and tailored interventions. Addressing childhood adversity through public health, policy, and clinical efforts can help support those at highest risk. Future research should examine these trajectories beyond early adulthood and explore protective factors that may buffer against long-term DEB risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.