ArticleBMC health services research2025
Developing a research agenda for maternal health in the Top End of the Northern Territory of Australia: a participatory approach.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEvidence supports that engaging consumers in developing and co-designing research priorities and protocols with key stakeholders improves acceptability of and participation in research and leads to better health outcomes. This is particularly relevant when considering research with First Nations, migrant and refugee populations, adolescents, women living with disability and those in the LGBTQIA + community who face systemic disadvantage, shouldering a disproportionate burden of poor outcomes. This study aimed to identify priorities for maternal health research in the Top End of the NT from the perspective of consumers and key stakeholders.
methodsUsing a participatory approach, focus groups and in-depth discussions with consumers, maternal health care providers and stakeholders were conducted over a three-month period (Part A), followed by a 1-day stakeholder forum in Darwin (Part B). Data was triangulated and a list of research priorities developed.
resultsFive priorities emerged. First, there is a need to develop and test strategies removing barriers for engagement of consumers and clinicians in maternal health research. Second, research into specific clinical concerns raised by consumers, such as prevention of preterm birth, must be complemented by health systems research enabling better patient journeys. Third, there is a need to develop and test innovative tools to enable comprehensive counselling of women from diverse backgrounds regarding aspects of care, based on most recent evidence-based and consumer needs. Further, there is a demand for research into innovative approaches to recruitment and retention of maternity care providers in a sparsely populated region of Australia, with a focus on provider well-being and continuity of integrated care. Finally, a need for research collaboration across similar settings and relevant disciplines to enable enhanced maternal health was identified.
conclusionsEmerging research priorities, implementing evidence-based practices, and regularly updating these priorities through ongoing stakeholder engagement, can work towards a future where maternal health services are accessible and responsive to the diverse needs of women and families residing in the Top End of the NT. Whilst consumers and stakeholders raised specific clinical priorities, health system research was identified as a key priority, focussing on patient journeys, co-design, and continuity of care through staff retention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.