ArticleBMC health services research2025
Assessing direct medical costs of children following a new prescription of ADHD medication.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeAttention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a prevalent childhood neurobehavioral disorder, imposing significant economic burdens on healthcare and society. This study aimed to examine healthcare resource utilisation and direct medical costs for paediatric ADHD patients in Catalonia, Spain, following their first ADHD treatment prescription.
methodsUsing real-world data from electronic healthcare records, this longitudinal register-based cohort study included all patients aged 6 to 18 years old who received a new centrally acting sympathomimetic treatment (ATC code N06BA) in the public healthcare system in Catalonia between 2016 and 2017. Healthcare resource utilisation and costs were analysed one year post-prescription, stratified by age (6-11, 12-14 and 15-18) and sex, for 3,507 patients.
resultsPrimary care (PC) physicians and nurses were the most utilised healthcare resources averaging about two and one visits per year, respectively. Costs peaked in the 11-14 age group, except for mental health hospitalisation costs, which were higher in other age groups; conversely, the adolescent group (15-18) had the lowest expenditure. ADHD patients showed high healthcare resource utilisation and costs within a year following the initial treatment prescription.
conclusionsFuture studies should explore the broader economic impact of ADHD, including costs within educational and social systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.