Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40731351›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2025

Herbs impact on poultry health and antimicrobial resistance: a scoping review with one health perspective.

Maha Dardouri, Meriem Maher Mtibaa, Sana Azaiez, Ahlem Mahjoub Khachroub, Wejdene Mansour

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Comparative effects ofVeterinary world · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maha DardouriFaculté de Médecine Ibn Al Jazzar Sousse, Laboratoire de Recherche Biophysique Métabolique Et Pharmacologie Appliquée, Université de Sousse, LR12ES02, Avenue Mohamed Karoui, 4002, Sousse, Tunisia.
Meriem Maher MtibaaFaculté de Médecine Ibn Al Jazzar Sousse, Laboratoire de Recherche Biophysique Métabolique Et Pharmacologie Appliquée, Université de Sousse, LR12ES02, Avenue Mohamed Karoui, 4002, Sousse, Tunisia.
Sana AzaiezFaculté de Médecine Ibn Al Jazzar Sousse, Laboratoire de Recherche Biophysique Métabolique Et Pharmacologie Appliquée, Université de Sousse, LR12ES02, Avenue Mohamed Karoui, 4002, Sousse, Tunisia.
Ahlem Mahjoub KhachroubFaculté de Médecine Ibn Al Jazzar Sousse, Laboratoire de Recherche Biophysique Métabolique Et Pharmacologie Appliquée, Université de Sousse, LR12ES02, Avenue Mohamed Karoui, 4002, Sousse, Tunisia.
Wejdene MansourFaculté de Médecine Ibn Al Jazzar Sousse, Laboratoire de Recherche Biophysique Métabolique Et Pharmacologie Appliquée, Université de Sousse, LR12ES02, Avenue Mohamed Karoui, 4002, Sousse, Tunisia. wejdene.mansour@gmail.com.

Funding

ICARS 200005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccording to evidence, medicinal plants such as thyme, rosemary, and fenugreek were beneficial for human health. Recently, these plants showed a great impact in animal health, particularly in poultry.

objectivesTo map the body of literature on the impact of medicinal plants on poultry health, including growth performance, gut microbiota, and mortality. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Articles published in the English language from January 2019 to February 2023 randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental studies, conducted on hens, chickens, or chicks that aimed to assess the effect of medicinal plants with or without prebiotics, on health-related outcomes including growth performance, mortality rate, and gut microbiota composition. SOURCES OF EVIDENCE: From December 2022 to February 2023, a systematic search on PubMed, Science Direct, and Google Scholar was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. CHARTING

methodsData charting was performed using a standardized form on Excel 365 that included study identification features, population and sample size, study groups, intervention description, follow-up period, and main outcomes.

resultsAfter the second screening, 38 articles were included. Results showed that thyme, rosemary, and peppermint were widely tested, and they were effective in promoting body weight gain, feed conversion ratio, live body weight, and microbiota, and in reducing mortality rate and intestinal multiple resistant bacteria. Cinnamon, lemon, garlic, and fenugreek were less commonly experimented. However, some studies that they were effective in improving growth performance and improving gut microbiota in healthy chickens.

conclusionsVarious studies confirmed that 5 to 6 g/kg of thyme powder was effective in improving growth performance and gut microbiota in healthy chickens. Further experiments are needed to compare the impact of thyme to antibiotics in chickens infected with multiple drug-resistant bacteria.

Indexed as

ChickensPlants, MedicinalPoultryAnimalsGastrointestinal MicrobiomeOne HealthThymus PlantTrigonellaHerbMedicinal plantMicrobiotaOne healthPoultry

Identifiers

PMID40731351
PMCPMC12306046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.