ArticleFluids and barriers of the CNS2025
Identifying a potential role of immune cells in gadolinium deposition within the brain.
Article in Fluids and barriers of the CNS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparative permeability of the blood-brain barrier to albumin, DTPA, and sucrose: effects of inflammation-induced disruption.Fluids and barriers of the CNS · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGadolinium (Gd) deposition in the brain was observed in patients with history of gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) administration. However, the exact mechanism behind this deposition remains unclear, especially given that an intact blood-brain barrier (BBB) is considered impermeable to GBCA. In this study, we propose that immune cells might play a role in facilitating GBCA entry into the brain despite an intact BBB.
methodsGadoterate meglumine, gadoteridol, gadobutrol and gadodiamide were investigated as GBCAs. Immune cells from human donor buffy coats were isolated, incubated with the GBCA and used in the experiments. Gd associated with the immune cells were measured using single-cell inductively coupled mass spectrometry (SC-ICP-MS). Flow cytometry analysis was performed to characterise the adhesion molecule expression profile on the immune cells and binding assay was employed to check the binding of Gd treated immune cells with endothelial ligands in static conditions. An in vitro model of the human BBB that prevents free diffusion of GBCA across was further used to observe immune cell behaviour at the BBB under physiological flow, in vitro.
resultsOur findings confirm that various immune cells, including CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, monocytes, NK cells and B cells are capable of taking up the different GBCAs. Furthermore, we demonstrate that GBCA loading does not impair immune cell interaction with the endothelial ligands required for successful extravasation across the BBB under static conditions. Most importantly, we show that T cells and monocytes, loaded with the different contrast agents, extravasated across an in vitro BBB model under physiological flow conditions in a comparable manner to non GBCA loaded cells.
conclusionsTaken together, our in vitro observations show that immune cells can transport GBCA across the BBB and could lead to permanent deposition of Gd in the brain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.