ArticleBMC bioinformatics2025
PuMA: PubMed gene/cell type-relation Atlas.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Hierarchical Multimodal Knowledge Graph for Neural Cell-Type-Specific Regulation Integrating Single-Cell Transcriptomics and Literature Evidence.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRapid extraction and visualization of cell-specific gene expression is important for automatic cell type annotation, e.g. in single cell analysis. There is an emerging field in which tools such as curated databases or machine learning methods are used to support cell type annotation. However, complementing approaches to efficiently incorporate the latest knowledge of free-text articles from literature databases, such as PubMed, are understudied.
resultsThis work introduces the PubMed Gene/Cell type-Relation Atlas (PuMA) which provides a local, easy-to-use web-interface to facilitate literature-driven cell type annotation. It utilizes a pretrained machine learning based named entity recognition model in order to extract gene and cell type concepts from PubMed, links biomedical ontologies, and suggests gene to cell type relations based on a ranking score. It includes a search tool for genes and cell types, additionally providing an interactive graph visualization for exploring cross-relations. Each result is fully traceable by linking the relevant PubMed articles.
conclusionsThis work enables researchers to analyse and automatize cell type annotation based on PubMed articles. It complements manual curated marker gene databases and enables interactive visualizations. The evaluation shows that PuMA is competitive against an extensive manual curated database across three gold standard datasets and two species-mouse and human. The software framework is freely available and enables regular article imports for incremental knowledge updates.GitLab: https://imigitlab.uni-muenster.de/published/PuMA/.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.