Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40731277›Full record

SynthesisBMC medical informatics and decision making2025

Trends and methods in intensive care unit (ICU) research using machine learning: latent dirichlet allocation (LDA)-based thematic literature review.

Duygu Topaloğlu, Olcay Polat

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Duygu TopaloğluDepartment of Logistics, Honaz Vocational School, Pamukkale University, Denizli, 20180, Turkey.
Olcay PolatDepartment of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Pamukkale University, Denizli, 20160, Turkey. opolat@pau.edu.tr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe use of machine learning (ML) in intensive care units (ICUs) has led to a large yet fragmented body of literature. It is imperative to conduct a systematic analysis and synthesis of this research to identify methodological trends, clinical applications, and knowledge deficits.

methodsA systematic literature review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines, encompassing 2,507 ICU-focused ML publications from 2019 to 2024. Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA), an unsupervised topic modeling approach, was used with n-gram and no-n-gram tokenization strategies. Bayesian optimization approaches were used to increase model coherence and diversity.

resultsThe analysis demonstrated a substantial degree of methodological variability, emphasizing the predominance of studies on infection surveillance and complication prediction. N-gram tokenization efficiently identified clinically specific topics, but no-n-gram techniques produced larger interpretative groups. Underexplored fields include emerging research areas like drug response prediction, pediatric-specific modeling, and surgical risk classification.

conclusionIn conclusion, the study highlights the significance of methodological transparency and tokenization strategies while offering a thorough topic overview and identifying methodological trends in the literature on ICU - ML. Future research should prioritize neglected areas such as pediatric care modeling and therapy response, utilizing advanced ML techniques and multimodal data integration to enhance the outcomes of ICU patients.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchIntensive Care UnitsMachine LearningBayes TheoremHumansClinical applicationsIntensive care unitLatent dirichlet allocationLiterature reviewMachine learningTopic modelingUnsupervised modeling

Identifiers

PMID40731277
PMCPMC12308941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.