SynthesisBMC medical informatics and decision making2025
Trends and methods in intensive care unit (ICU) research using machine learning: latent dirichlet allocation (LDA)-based thematic literature review.
Synthesis in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- An interpretable machine learning model for early prediction of subsequent observed CRRT initiation in patients with sepsis-associated acute kidney injury.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2026Observational
- A temporal adaptive dictionary-constrained LDA and Bi-calibrated dual granularity DTM framework for dynamic topic evolution analysis in academic papers.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Understanding Public Perceptions of Lung Cancer in China: Infodemiology Study of Baidu Index and Weibo Posts.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe use of machine learning (ML) in intensive care units (ICUs) has led to a large yet fragmented body of literature. It is imperative to conduct a systematic analysis and synthesis of this research to identify methodological trends, clinical applications, and knowledge deficits.
methodsA systematic literature review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines, encompassing 2,507 ICU-focused ML publications from 2019 to 2024. Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA), an unsupervised topic modeling approach, was used with n-gram and no-n-gram tokenization strategies. Bayesian optimization approaches were used to increase model coherence and diversity.
resultsThe analysis demonstrated a substantial degree of methodological variability, emphasizing the predominance of studies on infection surveillance and complication prediction. N-gram tokenization efficiently identified clinically specific topics, but no-n-gram techniques produced larger interpretative groups. Underexplored fields include emerging research areas like drug response prediction, pediatric-specific modeling, and surgical risk classification.
conclusionIn conclusion, the study highlights the significance of methodological transparency and tokenization strategies while offering a thorough topic overview and identifying methodological trends in the literature on ICU - ML. Future research should prioritize neglected areas such as pediatric care modeling and therapy response, utilizing advanced ML techniques and multimodal data integration to enhance the outcomes of ICU patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.