ArticleBMC public health2025
Breast cancer screening and prevention in the UAE: a cross-sectional study of risk awareness and provider engagement.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of a student-led breast cancer awareness campaign as a co-curricular model in pharmacy education: a mixed-methods study in the UAE.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Investigating women's motivations to engage in early mammography screening in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2026Article
- Public knowledge, attitudes, and barriers to cancer screening in the UAE: a comprehensive assessment to inform screening practices.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEffective breast cancer (BC) control relies on the uptake of preventive measures, engagement with screening practices, and informed risk communication. This study examined breast cancer (BC) preventive measures and screening practices undertaken by women in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), as well as the BC risk assessment and screening recommendations provided by their healthcare providers.
methodThis cross-sectional study was conducted among women aged 35 years and older in the UAE. Data collection utilised a validated and self-administered online questionnaire. BC risk was assessed using the Gail Model, which calculated lifetime and 5-year risk estimates. Data analysis included descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and logistic regression to evaluate associations and identify key factors influencing risk and preventive measures.
resultsA total of 1,049 women participated; 59% were aged 40–69 years, and 41% were under 40 years. High 5-year and lifetime breast cancer (BC) risks were identified in 8.2% and 4.6% of participants, respectively. Women aged 40–69 were significantly more likely to pursue preventive measures and screening practices, undergo BC risk assessments, and receive screening recommendations from healthcare providers. However, most participants reported rarely or never undergoing mammography (68%), clinical breast exams (68%), or breast self-exams (56%). Moreover, 54% were not informed of their BC risk, 61% did not undergo a risk assessment, and 40% did not receive screening recommendations from healthcare providers. Women at high BC risk were more likely to undergo risk assessment, receive provider recommendations, and engage in screening activities.
conclusionWhile women at high BC risk were more engaged in risk assessment and screening, the overall uptake of preventive and screening practices across the study participants was suboptimal. These findings highlight the need for improved public health strategies and greater provider engagement in BC risk communication and prevention efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.