Trial reportAmerican journal of epidemiology2026
Effect of voucher receipt on perceived discrimination in boys and girls in the Moving to Opportunity study.
Trial report in American journal of epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Systems-Level Interventions to Disrupt Structural Racism and Improve Black Adolescent Health Outcomes: A Scoping Review.Societies (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Section 8 vouchers help low-income families relocate to lower-poverty neighborhoods, potentially altering neighborhood racial/ethnic composition and exposure to perceived discrimination. The Moving to Opportunity study randomized families to a low-poverty voucher, traditional voucher, or control. Low-poverty voucher recipients could use vouchers in neighborhoods with <20% poverty, while traditional voucher recipients had no restrictions. We estimated the effect of voucher receipt at baseline (1994-1998) on non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic adolescents' perceived racial/ethnic discrimination in 2001 to 2002 (n = 2200), and identified heterogeneity across voucher types, cities (Boston, Chicago, New York, Los Angeles), and sexes. We used a doubly robust adaptive shrinkage approach to identify effect modifiers (sex and city) in each voucher comparison group and discrimination setting. On average, across cities, low-poverty voucher receipt reduced risk of perceived police discrimination among boys and girls. In Los Angeles, among boys and girls, low-poverty voucher and traditional voucher receipt, respectively, reduced risk of perceived school and neighborhood discrimination. Receipt of a traditional voucher increased risk of perceived discrimination at stores in Chicago and perceived neighborhood discrimination in Boston, Chicago, and New York. Offering vouchers may affect participants' risk of perceived discrimination, but this effect depends on voucher type and city.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.