Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40731248›Full record

Trial reportAmerican journal of epidemiology2026

Effect of voucher receipt on perceived discrimination in boys and girls in the Moving to Opportunity study.

Anna Krasnova, Dustin T Duncan, Jeremy Kane, Keely Cheslack-Postava, Sarah E Tom, Kara E Rudolph

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in American journal of epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anna KrasnovaDepartment of Epidemiology, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7119-308X
Dustin T DuncanDepartment of Epidemiology, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8586-8711
Jeremy KaneDepartment of Epidemiology, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6598-3840
Keely Cheslack-PostavaGlobal Psychiatric Epidemiology Group, Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, New York State Psychiatric Institute,  New York, NY, United States.
Sarah E TomDepartment of Neurology, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0094-5138
Kara E RudolphDepartment of Epidemiology, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9417-7960

Funding

Benioff Homelessness and Housing InitiativeNational Heart, Lung and Blood Institute R01HL160325National Institute on Allergy and Infectious Diseases UG3AI169658National Institute on Mental Health R01MH129198, P30MH043520NIDA NIH HHS R01DA054553, P30DA011041NIMHD NIH HHS R01MD013554, R01MD013554-S1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Section 8 vouchers help low-income families relocate to lower-poverty neighborhoods, potentially altering neighborhood racial/ethnic composition and exposure to perceived discrimination. The Moving to Opportunity study randomized families to a low-poverty voucher, traditional voucher, or control. Low-poverty voucher recipients could use vouchers in neighborhoods with <20% poverty, while traditional voucher recipients had no restrictions. We estimated the effect of voucher receipt at baseline (1994-1998) on non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic adolescents' perceived racial/ethnic discrimination in 2001 to 2002 (n = 2200), and identified heterogeneity across voucher types, cities (Boston, Chicago, New York, Los Angeles), and sexes. We used a doubly robust adaptive shrinkage approach to identify effect modifiers (sex and city) in each voucher comparison group and discrimination setting. On average, across cities, low-poverty voucher receipt reduced risk of perceived police discrimination among boys and girls. In Los Angeles, among boys and girls, low-poverty voucher and traditional voucher receipt, respectively, reduced risk of perceived school and neighborhood discrimination. Receipt of a traditional voucher increased risk of perceived discrimination at stores in Chicago and perceived neighborhood discrimination in Boston, Chicago, and New York. Offering vouchers may affect participants' risk of perceived discrimination, but this effect depends on voucher type and city.

Indexed as

PovertyRacismAdolescentBlack or African AmericanBostonChicagoFemaleHispanic or LatinoHumansLos AngelesMaleNeighborhood CharacteristicsNew York Cityadolescentsdiscriminationhousing voucherMoving to Opportunityneighborhood

Identifiers

PMID40731248
PMCPMC12780763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.