ArticleUltrasonics sonochemistry2025
Cavitation-vibration coupling mechanism in ultrasonic guidewire vascular ablation.
Article in Ultrasonics sonochemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Effective treatment of diverse vascular occlusions requires precise energy delivery and tissue-specific ablation strategies. This study systematically investigates the coupled mechanical vibration and cavitation mechanisms of a novel flexible ultrasonic guidewire during ablation of calcified, lipid-rich, and thrombotic occlusion mimics. Integrating numerical simulations and experimental validation, this work elucidates the dynamic interplay between ultrasonic parameters and tissue-specific ablation outcomes. For calcified mimics, mechanical vibrational impact is the dominant ablation mechanism, achieving substantial material removal primarily through fracture. Lipid-rich tissue ablation is driven by emulsification via cavitation microjets and acoustic streaming, generating microparticles with sizes of 10-250 μm, controllable by ultrasonic power. Thrombus ablation involves initial penetration followed by erythrocyte lysis, primarily mediated by transient cavitation. Crucially, guidewire bending significantly attenuates tip vibration amplitude, resulting in a reduction of 14.3-30.9 %, with titanium alloy exhibiting superior energy transmission stability under curvature compared to nickel-titanium. These findings highlight distinct, tissue-dependent ablation paradigms: mechanical fragmentation for hard tissues compared to cavitation and streaming induced emulsification or lysis for soft tissues. This mechanistic understanding is foundational for designing adaptive ultrasonic guidewires capable of adjusting energy delivery modes based on real time feedback of tissue characteristics, thereby enhancing the precision and efficacy of endovascular interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.