Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40731150›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Comparing the characteristics of electric scooter and bicycle injuries: a retrospective cohort study.

Laura Seitakari, Oskari Pakarinen, Veli-Pekka Harjola, Maaret Castrén, Henri Vasara

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Laura SeitakariDepartment of Emergency Medicine and Services, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Oskari PakarinenDepartment of Emergency Medicine and Services, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Veli-Pekka HarjolaDepartment of Emergency Medicine and Services, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Maaret CastrénDepartment of Emergency Medicine and Services, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Henri VasaraDepartment of Emergency Medicine and Services, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. henri.vasara@helsinki.fi.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electric scooters (e-scooters) and bicycles are used for similar purposes as transportation. Few studies have shown that e-scooter and bicycle accidents differ in terms of user-profiles and injury characteristics. Still, there is missing information comparing the specific injury types, the overall incidence, and the relative risk of these accidents. We aimed to compare the characteristics, severity, and rate of e-scooter and bicycle injuries and assess their relative risk. We conducted a retrospective register study comparing e-scooter and bicycle injuries treated in emergency departments in Helsinki between 1.1.2022 and 31.12.2023. Data was collected from the Helsinki University Hospital electronic data pool. We evaluated injury severity using the Abbreviated Injury Score. The incidence and relative risk for e-scooter accidents was assessed based on the usage data of all shared e-scooters, and the estimation of bicycle trips was made utilizing several travel surveys. There were 677 e-scooter accidents and 1889 bicycle accidents during the study period. E-scooter riders were younger, with a mean age of 33 (SD 13), compared to cyclists with a mean age of 47 (SD 17). The incidence of e-scooter accidents leading to ED care was 7.8 per 100,000 trips, whereas the estimated incidence of bicycle accidents was 2.2 per 100,000 trips. The relative risk for e-scooter accidents leading to ED care was 3.6 (CI 3.3-3.9), compared to bicycle accidents, E-scooter riders were more likely to ride intoxicated (incidence 29% vs. 8%) and less likely to wear a helmet (4% vs. 28%) compared with cyclists. Head injuries occurred more often with e-scooter riders (46% vs. 31%) compared to cyclists, whereas torso injuries were more common among cyclists (11% vs. 5%) than e-scooter riders. A higher proportion of e-scooter accidents happened during the nighttime, between 10 PM and 8 AM, compared to cyclists (40% vs. 31%). Intoxicated riding was also more common among e-scooter riders during the nighttime (50% vs. 22%). E-scooter and bicycle accidents differ in terms of patient characteristics and injury types. The high incidence of head injuries and intoxicated riders among e-scooter riders suggests that preventive measures on e-scooters are warranted. E-scooter riding very likely poses a higher risk for injuries than cycling.

Indexed as

Accidents, TrafficBicyclingWounds and InjuriesAdolescentAdultAgedEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleFinlandHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultAccidentBicycleBikeComparisonCyclingElectric scooterE-scooterInjury

Identifiers

PMID40731150
PMCPMC12307889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.