Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40731145›Full record

ArticleCommunications psychology2025

Spatial but not temporal orienting of attention enhances the temporal acuity of human peripheral vision.

Francois R Foerster, A Giersch, A Cleeremans

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Francois R FoersterConsciousness, Cognition and Computation Group (CO3), Center for Research in Cognition and Neurosciences (CRCN), ULB Neuroscience Institute (UNI), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium. francoisfoerster@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9454-4815
A GierschUniversité de Strasbourg, INSERM U1329, Pôle de Psychiatrie, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8577-6021
A CleeremansConsciousness, Cognition and Computation Group (CO3), Center for Research in Cognition and Neurosciences (CRCN), ULB Neuroscience Institute (UNI), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The temporal acuity of a sensory system determines its capacity to detect delays between events, which enables following events in time and adapting behaviors accordingly. Whether and how voluntary attention drives visual temporal acuity is still unclear, especially in peripheral vision where attention is critical to avoid missing information. The present study aims at 1) evaluating whether cue-based spatial and temporal orientation of visual attention modulates the temporal acuity in peripheral vision, 2) assessing to what extent these modulations rely on shared or distinct attentional mechanisms, and 3) exploring whether these modulations are cumulative or independent from each other. Forty participants performed an asynchrony detection task in immersive virtual reality whilst electroencephalographic and pupillary dynamics were recorded. We found reductions of pupil constriction during the processing of attentional cues, suggesting that the pupil diameter represents a readout of the formation of spatiotemporal expectations. We further found that pre-target oscillatory dynamics in posterior theta and alpha bands are suppressed by both spatial and temporal orienting of attention, with cumulative effects, thus providing evidence for integrated mechanisms of spatial and temporal attention. Yet, despite these modulations, only explicit spatial orienting enhances the sensitivity to asynchronies. This highlights that explicit endogenous attention directed to space-but not to time-increases the temporal acuity under spatial uncertainty in peripheral vision. Overall, these results cast unambiguous doubts on the accepted trade-off that spatial attention meliorates spatial visual acuity while impeding temporal visual acuity, and thus call for the further refinement of models of visual attention.

Identifiers

PMID40731145
PMCPMC12307885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.