ArticleCommunications psychology2025
Spatial but not temporal orienting of attention enhances the temporal acuity of human peripheral vision.
Article in Communications psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Investigating developmental changes in susceptibility to temporal audiovisual illusions on balance and sensorimotor function in children.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Rapid modulation of choice behavior by ultrasound on the human frontal eye fields.Nature communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The temporal acuity of a sensory system determines its capacity to detect delays between events, which enables following events in time and adapting behaviors accordingly. Whether and how voluntary attention drives visual temporal acuity is still unclear, especially in peripheral vision where attention is critical to avoid missing information. The present study aims at 1) evaluating whether cue-based spatial and temporal orientation of visual attention modulates the temporal acuity in peripheral vision, 2) assessing to what extent these modulations rely on shared or distinct attentional mechanisms, and 3) exploring whether these modulations are cumulative or independent from each other. Forty participants performed an asynchrony detection task in immersive virtual reality whilst electroencephalographic and pupillary dynamics were recorded. We found reductions of pupil constriction during the processing of attentional cues, suggesting that the pupil diameter represents a readout of the formation of spatiotemporal expectations. We further found that pre-target oscillatory dynamics in posterior theta and alpha bands are suppressed by both spatial and temporal orienting of attention, with cumulative effects, thus providing evidence for integrated mechanisms of spatial and temporal attention. Yet, despite these modulations, only explicit spatial orienting enhances the sensitivity to asynchronies. This highlights that explicit endogenous attention directed to space-but not to time-increases the temporal acuity under spatial uncertainty in peripheral vision. Overall, these results cast unambiguous doubts on the accepted trade-off that spatial attention meliorates spatial visual acuity while impeding temporal visual acuity, and thus call for the further refinement of models of visual attention.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.