Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40731129›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

An optimized anomaly detection framework in industrial control systems through grey wolf optimizer and autoencoder integration.

Muhammad Muzamil Aslam, Liyanage Chandratilak De Silva, Rosyzie Anna Awg Haji Mohd Apong, Ali Tufail

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Muhammad Muzamil AslamSchool of Digital Science, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Gadong A, Bandar Seri Begawan, BE1410, Brunei Darussalam.
Liyanage Chandratilak De SilvaSchool of Digital Science, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Gadong A, Bandar Seri Begawan, BE1410, Brunei Darussalam. liyanage.silva@ubd.edu.bn.
Rosyzie Anna Awg Haji Mohd ApongSchool of Digital Science, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Gadong A, Bandar Seri Begawan, BE1410, Brunei Darussalam.
Ali TufailSchool of Digital Science, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Gadong A, Bandar Seri Begawan, BE1410, Brunei Darussalam. ali.tufail@ubd.edu.bn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ensuring reliable Internet connectivity in Industrial Control Systems is critical for real-time monitoring and anomaly detection. Existing methods, however, struggle with high computational complexity, limited applicability to specific datasets, and elevated false-positive rates. This paper presents a novel collaborative data processing framework that enhances anomaly detection in ICS by integrating the Grey Wolf Optimizer with Autoencoders. The proposed approach optimizes GWO by improving prey selection, encircling mechanisms, and initial population generation, while enhancing AE dropout functionality for improved model generalization. The method operates in two stages: (1) Optimizing GWO for feature selection to identify relevant features and reduce feature errors, and (2) Utilizing AE for efficient anomaly detection. Experimental validation on the SWaT and WADI benchmark datasets demonstrates the superior performance of the proposed model, achieving significant improvements in accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score over existing state-of-the-art approaches. These results highlight the potential of the proposed approach in addressing the limitations of current anomaly detection systems in ICS.

Indexed as

Anomaly detectionCollaborative approach (GWO+AE)Industrial control systemSecuritySWaTWADI datasets

Identifiers

PMID40731129
PMCPMC12307620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.