Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40731119›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Goal-oriented autonomous decision-making for social robots via collaborative interactive inverse reinforcement learning approach.

Mingyue Luo, Hui Li, Wanbo Luo, Hewei Li, Jianan Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mingyue LuoSchool of Mechatronic Engineering, Changchun University of Technology, Yan'an St., Changchun, 130012, Jilin Province, China.
Hui Li *School of Mechatronic Engineering, Changchun University of Technology, Yan'an St., Changchun, 130012, Jilin Province, China. lihui@ccut.edu.cn.
Wanbo Luo *Changchun Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Tulip St., Changchun, 130122, Jilin Province, China. luobiosci@126.com.
Hewei Li *School of Mechatronic Engineering, Changchun University of Technology, Yan'an St., Changchun, 130012, Jilin Province, China.
Jianan Li *School of Mechatronic Engineering, Changchun University of Technology, Yan'an St., Changchun, 130012, Jilin Province, China.

Funding

Science & Technology Department of Jilin Province 20220204090YY
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the practical constraints of unknown pedestrian goal information, research on inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) applied to social robots has focused on trajectory planning based on current motion direction, other pedestrians, and obstacles. However, social robots typically have clear navigation goals, and the practicality of the aforementioned methods is debatable. Moreover, trajectory prediction at longer distances also poses significant challenges for such trajectory planning methods. Therefore, this paper proposes a goal-oriented autonomous decision-making (GO-ADM) method, which addresses the social compatibility navigation problem of robots through sequential actions at each discrete time steps, eliminating the need to predict pedestrian trajectories. Specifically, this paper defines and collects goal-oriented expert demonstration and propose a collaborative interactive IRL framework for social robots. By exploring both explicit and implicit norms of pedestrian motion in the expert demonstration, goal-oriented reward function was ultimately integrated into GO-ADM to achieve goal-oriented autonomous decision-making for social robots. Additionally, GO-ADM incorporates a penalty function for social safety distance to further ensure the safety of human-robot interaction. Considering the longitudinal dominant navigation task of pedestrians in real-world scenarios, this study constructs a realistic training environment to validate the longitudinal and lateral dominant navigation tasks of the GO-ADM. The results demonstrate that, under both longitudinal and lateral dominant navigation tasks, the robot is capable of making rational autonomous decisions, with the final average deviation from the destination being less than 0.13 m and 0.23 m, respectively, and average deviation rates are less than 0.18% and 1.1%. Furthermore, reduplicate experiments demonstrate that GO-ADM achieves higher success rate with other social navigation and decision-making algorithms. Under severe interference conditions, with maximum noise 0.5 m, the success rate of GO-ADM exceeding 75%, demonstrating strong robustness against unknown interferences.

Indexed as

Autonomous decision-makingCollaborative interactive IRLGoal-orientedSocial robots

Identifiers

PMID40731119
PMCPMC12307699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.