SynthesisJournal of human hypertension2025
Association between bullous pemphigoid and hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.
Synthesis in Journal of human hypertension, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Studies have indicated a relationship between bullous pemphigoid (BP) and hypertension, but the findings remain controversial. To examine this association, we conducted a systematic review using studies from PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, applying a random-effects model while performing subgroup and sensitivity analyses to explore potential sources of heterogeneity. Subgroup analyses were performed by country, data source, and sample size. The quality of evidence was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The review protocol was registered in PROSPERO (ID: CRD42024573911). The analysis included 20 studies, primarily consisting of case-control studies from Europe and Asia, encompassing 72,981,822 participants, of whom 29,199 had BP. The mean ages of the BP group and the non-BP group were 74.62 and 74.25 years, respectively. Random-effects meta-analysis demonstrated a significant association between BP and hypertension (odds ratio [OR] = 1.13, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.07-1.20). Subgroup analyses revealed stronger associations in database studies (OR = 1.24, 95% CI: 1.17-1.31) and in studies with over 1000 BP cases (OR = 1.30, 95% CI: 1.23-1.37). No significant association was observed in studies conducted in Asia (OR = 1.05) or Europe (OR = 1.07). However, a significant relationship was found in studies from the United States (OR = 1.29, 95% CI: 1.12-1.48). This study found a significant correlation between BP and hypertension, particularly in the United States. However, as most included studies were observational in nature, causality cannot be inferred. Further research is needed to elucidate the underlying mechanisms and causal relationship between BP and hypertension.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40731091What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.