ReviewNature reviews. Urology2025
Iatrogenic upper urinary tract injuries during ureteroscopy for urolithiasis: a comprehensive review on incidence, mechanisms and preventative strategies.
Review in Nature reviews. Urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Incidence and context-specific risk patterns of ureteral avulsion and perforation during ureteroscopy: EAU endourology systematic review and meta-analysis.Urolithiasis · 2026Pooled it
- Urolithiasis in patients with cancer.Nature reviews. Urology · 2026Review
- HMGB1-mediated macrophage polarization to M2 phenotype promotes ureteral stricture: therapeutic potential of HMGB1 inhibitors.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The incidence of urolithiasis is increasing globally, with a prevalence of 13% in North America and 9% in Europe. Ureteroscopy is a minimally invasive approach for treating conditions affecting the upper urinary tract, including urolithiasis, for which its efficacy and safety is well recognized. There is a risk of complications associated with ureteroscopy, including iatrogenic mechanical ureteric injuries. These injuries are multifactorial in nature, with ureteroscopes and auxiliary endoscopic equipment having an important role, in addition to patient and stone factors. Excessive friction and insertion forces during ureteroscope and ureteric access sheath insertion, apparatus malfunction or thermal injuries during laser lithotripsy might cause injury to the upper urinary tract. Ureteric avulsion is a serious event, which necessitates further intervention such as ureteric reimplantation or nephrectomy. Ureteric mucosal injuries can be managed with a period of ureteric stenting, although stent-related symptoms can be challenging for patients. The ability of endoscopic equipment to injure the ureter is an area that requires further study to reduce incidence and minimize patient morbidity. In this article, we review the operative mechanisms that contribute to iatrogenic mechanical ureteric injuries and discuss preventative strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40731086What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.