ArticleScientific reports2025
Comparative analysis of 3D-culture techniques for multicellular colorectal tumour spheroids and development of a novel SW48 3D-model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biomimetic Scaffold-Based 3D Models for Decoding Cancer Biology and Advancing Therapy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Article
- Plying potency assays for immunotherapy of solid tumors.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- A Robust Marine Collagen Peptide-Agarose 3D Culture System for In Vitro Modeling of Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Anti-Cancer Therapeutic Development.Marine drugs · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is an important global health challenge, with nearly 2 million diagnosed cases and over 900,000 deaths annually despite therapeutic advancements. The high morbidity and mortality rates underscore the need for more efficient therapies. Three-dimensional (3D) cell culture models have emerged as more physiologically relevant alternatives to traditional two-dimensional (2D) models for drug screening and mechanistic studies. However, generating consistent spheroids across different CRC cell lines presents technical challenges, and protocols remain inconsistent. This study evaluated different 3D culture methodologies, i.e. overlay on agarose, hanging drop, and U-bottom plates without matrix or with methylcellulose, Matrigel or collagen type I hydrogels, across eight CRC cell lines. Multicellular tumour spheroids (MCTS) morphology and cell viability were analysed. Co-cultures with immortalised colonic fibroblasts were explored to improve the physiological relevance of the tumour models. The study provided insights into the morphological and viability characteristics of 3D cultures across multiple CRC cell lines. A novel compact spheroid model using the SW48 cell line was successfully developed. Co-culture experiments with fibroblasts offered additional insights into tumour-stroma interactions in a 3D setting. This study contributes to the advancement of more physiologically relevant in vitro CRC models, potentially enhancing the accuracy of preclinical studies and drug screening processes. The successful 3D model of SW48 expands the repertoire of CRC cell lines available for 3D culture studies. The treatment of regular multi-well plates with anti-adherence solution allows to generate CRC spheroids at significantly lower cost than using cell-repellent multi-well plates. These findings may lead to improved preclinical models for CRC research and drug development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.