ArticleScientific reports2025
Classifying social and physical pain from multimodal physiological signals using machine learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate pain assessment is essential for effective management; however, most studies have focused on differentiating pain from non-pain or estimating pain intensity rather than distinguishing between distinct pain types. We present a machine learning method for classifying physical and social pain using physiological signals. Seventy-three healthy adults participated in experiments involving baseline, neutral, and pain-inducing stimuli related to both types of pain. Physical pain was elicited by pressure cuff inflation, whereas social pain was induced by watching a video depicting a loved one's death. The electrocardiogram, electrodermal activity, photoplethysmogram, respiration, and finger temperature were recorded, and 12 physiological features were extracted. Three machine learning algorithms-logistic regression, support vector machine, and random forest-were employed to classify the input data into baseline versus painful states and physical versus social pain. Our findings demonstrated high accuracy in identifying social pain (0.82) and physical pain (0.90) compared to the baseline. Classification accuracy between physical and social pain was moderate (0.63) when using painful state data alone but improved to 0.77 when incorporating reactivity from neutral to painful states. This study highlights the potential of multimodal physiological signals for differentiating pain types and enhancing personalized pain management strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.