ArticleScientific reports2025
Exploring the influence of vitamin C concentrations on the dynamics of RT-PCR assay reactions.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) that caused the COVID-19 pandemic to break out touched off a global health catastrophe characterized by various degrees of disease severity among those who were afflicted. Many strategies, such as vitamin C administration, have been investigated to reduce COVID-19 symptoms. Although the exact processes by which vitamin C affects COVID-19 remain unclear, noticeable changes in PCR test results were noted in our laboratory settings. This study uses PCR analysis to investigate the effects of varying vitamin C dosages and durations on COVID-19 test results. PCR cycle threshold (Ct) values were used to categorize nasopharyngeal tissues from 98 patients (Ct < 30, Ct ≥ 30, negative). Vitamin C was applied at different concentrations (0, 1, 10, 50, and 100 mg/ml), and PCR analyses were carried out at 1, 10, 24, and 48 h marks after the vitamin was applied. Particularly in samples with lower Ct values, the data showed significant changes in the reaction graphs and metrics with increasing vitamin C concentration. Higher concentrations of vitamin C were correlated with diminished metrics, occasionally leading to negative results for samples with Ct ≥ 30 values. Notably, samples that showed no discernible viral loads had different pictorial representations. These results raise questions regarding the reliability of PCR results in the presence of vitamin C intake and have implications for COVID-19 diagnosis. In light of the current pandemic, more studies are necessary to confirm and expand these findings and provide a critical understanding of clinical procedures and the interpretation of test results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.