Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40731046›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Family social support during incarceration: implications for health upon release.

Chantal Fahmy, Alexander Testa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Chantal FahmyDepartment of Criminology and Criminal Justice, The University of Texas at San Antonio, 501 West Cesar E. Chavez Blvd., San Antonio, TX, 78207, USA. Chantal.Fahmy@utsa.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6010-8457
Alexander TestaDepartment of Management, Policy, and Community Health, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8686-9115

Funding

Bureau of Justice Statistics 2017-BJ-CX-0014CSRD VA I01 CX000111National Institute of Justice 2014-MU-CX-0111
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Incarceration is associated with adverse physical and mental health that are often brought to light during reentry into the community, particularly in the immediate period following release. Social support, specifically from family members, has been identified as a key protective factor that may promote health and reintegration success among formerly incarcerated individuals. However, less is known about how specific types of family support-emotional and instrumental-relate to health outcomes following release from incarceration. The current study uses data from 517 individuals incarcerated in a large Texas prison, surveyed before and approximately one month after release, to examine the relationship between family support and self-rated physical and mental health. Logistic regression models revealed that strong emotional family support was significantly associated with better self-rated physical health and mental health one month post-release. Additionally, strong instrumental family support predicted better mental health but not physical health among respondents. These findings highlight the crucial role of emotional and instrumental familial support systems in fostering and reducing health disparities and promoting equity among justice-impacted populations.

Indexed as

FamilyPrisonersSocial SupportAdultFemaleHealth StatusHumansIncarcerationMaleMental HealthMiddle AgedPrisonsTexasYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40731046
PMCPMC12307891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.