ArticleScientific reports2025
Spatial assessment of heavy metal contamination in groundwater in the Kadaladi region, Tamil Nadu, India.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact Assessment and Sustainable Remediation of Heavy Metal and Radioactive Contamination in Aquatic Systems: A Review.Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation · 2026Review
- Article
- Groundwater quality and health risk assessment in the Baddi-Barotiwala-Nalagarh industrial belt of the northwestern Himalayas.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Groundwater quality in Kadaladi is a critical concern due to contamination from natural and human activities. This study assesses heavy metal concentrations across pre-monsoon and post-monsoon seasons at 44 sampling sites, using the Heavy Metal Pollution Index (HPI), Metal Index (MI), and non-carcinogenic risk (HQ) assessments. Key heavy metals analysed include Cu, Pb, Zn, Ni, Cd, Mn, and Fe, in Pre-monsoon and Post-monsoon with comparisons to WHO (2017) standards using atomic absorption spectrometry. The Heavy Metal Pollution Index (HPI) and Metal Index (MI) were computed to assess contamination levels, and health risks were evaluated through non-carcinogenic hazard quotient (HQ) models for adults and children. Results revealed that Mn and Fe concentrations exceeded WHO permissible limits in 20% of the samples, with Site 33 showing the highest pollution in HPI (99.1) and MI (17.89). Post-monsoon samples showed notably higher contamination, attributed to monsoonal leaching and runoff from agricultural and saltpan activities. GIS-based spatial analysis identified persistent hotspots at Sites 6, 24, and 33. Children were particularly vulnerable, with HQ values exceeding 2.0 in affected zones, especially due to Mn exposure. HQ values indicated that children face higher health risks, particularly from Mn, exceeding permissible limits in 4.55% of samples. Pearson correlation revealed strong Mn-Fe geogenic associations, while Cd-Mn correlations post-monsoon pointed to anthropogenic sources. The integration of spatial mapping using GIS and statistical methods provides insight into contamination hotspots, emphasizing the critical role of monsoonal hydrology in mobilizing pollutants. These findings underscore the need for region-specific mitigation strategies and regular water quality monitoring. The study fills a regional knowledge gap and contributes globally relevant insights on managing groundwater quality in vulnerable coastal systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.