Trial reportScientific reports2025
Enhancing theory of mind in autism through humanoid robot interaction in a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multimodal Human-Computer Interaction Interventions for Children and Adolescents With Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Scoping Review.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2026Article
- Mesenchymal stem/stromal cell-based therapies for autism spectrum disorder: emerging evidence and clinical prospects.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Can AI-driven games enhance social skills for autistic children? - A three-level meta-analysis.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Review
- Body Knowledge and Emotion Recognition in Preschool Children: A Comparative Study of Human Versus Robot Tutors.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Autism Spectrum Disorder presents significant challenges in social cognition, particularly in understanding others' thoughts, emotions, and intentions. Traditional interventions often rely on role-playing games with human therapists or inanimate objects, but these approaches may lack consistency and ecological validity. This study integrated Applied Behavior Analysis principles with robot-assisted training to improve social cognition in children with autism. A randomized, two-period crossover trial involving 32 children (mean age = 7.53 ± 1.32 years, 7 females) compared robot-assisted training using the humanoid robot iCub with standard therapy and an active human-assisted control condition. During robot-assisted sessions, children engaged in structured social role-play scenarios, practicing essential social skills such as perspective-taking, joint attention, and recognizing intentions. The robot's human-like appearance and adaptive behavior provided an engaging, predictable learning environment. Results indicated that robot-assisted training significantly improved social cognition, in contrast to traditional therapy and the human-assisted control group, where no improvements were found. Importantly, the active human control confirmed that these improvements were driven by the robot's presence rather than the protocol itself. These findings demonstrate the potential of humanoid robots as effective therapeutic tools for enhancing social skills in children with autism, offering a scalable and engaging complement to existing clinical practices. Clinical Trial Registration: ISRCTN15341724, registered on May 6, 2025. Available at: https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN15341724 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.