ReviewEuropean journal of medical research2025
Advances in the diagnosis and treatment of congenital scoliosis.
Review in European journal of medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Radiological analysis of congenital spinal deformities in patients associated with anorectal malformations: a cross-sectional study of 86 patients.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Review
- Shilla growth guidance vs. distraction-based constructs for severe, early-onset congenital scoliosis treated with 3-column osteotomy.Spine deformity · 2026Article
- Growth-Based Decision-Making in Congenital Scoliosis with Multiple Vertebral Anomalies.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Congenital scoliosis (CS), a severe form of early-onset scoliosis (EOS), arises from vertebral malformations during embryogenesis, driven by complex genetic and environmental interactions. This review synthesizes recent advances in understanding CS etiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Genetically, CS is linked to mutations in TBX6, GDF3, DSTYK, and COL11A2, alongside copy number variations (CNVs) and epigenetic modifications such as allele-specific methylation in SVIL and TNS3. Maternal hypoxia, toxin exposure, and nutritional deficiencies further contribute to pathogenesis. Diagnosis incorporates advanced imaging techniques-such as X-rays, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and computed tomography (CT)-as well as genetic testing, with whole-exome sequencing identifying mutations in 18.6% of cases. Conservative management, including casting and bracing (e.g., alternating cast and brace treatment [ARCBT] and 3D-printed orthoses), effectively delays progression in mild-to-moderate cases. Surgical interventions-such as hemivertebra resection, hybrid techniques (HT), and growth-modulating technologies including magnetic controlled growth rods (MCGR) and the Shilla method-have demonstrated improved outcomes in patients with severe deformities. HT combines posterior osteotomy with dual growing rods, achieving significant Cobb angle correction (81.4° to 40.1°) and spinal growth (1.23 cm/year) with fewer complications. MCGR reduces repeated surgeries but shows variable impacts on quality of life. Emerging approaches, including apical control techniques and robotics, highlight the shift toward personalized care. This review underscores the need for multidisciplinary strategies to optimize outcomes, emphasizing early diagnosis, tailored treatments, and long-term monitoring to address CS complexity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.