Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40730982›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2025

Triage decision-making levels and affective factors of nurses working in cardiovascular emergency department and intensive care units: a cross-sectional study.

Sevda Turen, Filiz Cetinkaya Isik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sevda TurenDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Istanbul Arel University, Istanbul, Turkey. sevdamercanhm@hotmail.com.
Filiz Cetinkaya IsikHealth Sciences University Istanbul Mehmet Akif Ersoy Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Training Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmergency department (ED) and intensive care units (ICUs) are areas where triage is frequently applied. This study was conducted to evaluate the triage decision-making levels and affective factors of nurses working in adult cardiovascular ED and ICUs.

methodsThis is a cross-sectional study conducted in a tertiary cardiovascular healthcare center. The triage decision-making levels of nurses were assessed by the "Triage Decision Making Inventory (TDMI)".

resultsThe mean age of the nurses (n = 110) was determined as 28.39 ± 4.71 years, the duration of working in ED/ICUs was determined as 45.47 ± 29.17 months and the duration of professional experience was determined as 65.35 ± 48.46 months. The majority of the nurses in the study were female (77.3%), single (61.8%), bachelor's degree graduates (76.4%) and night - day shift workers (76.4%). The mean TDMI total score of the nurses was determined as 171.12 ± 21.02. A statistically significant association was found between the nurses' age, duration of professional experience, gender, working type, receiving triage training after graduation and considering themselves competent in triage and their triage decision-making levels (p < 0.05).

conclusionIt was determined that the triage decision-making levels of nurses working in adult cardiovascular ED and ICUs were high, but the majority of them did not consider themselves competent in triage. According to the results of this study, it is recommended that triage training of nurses be supported by institutions and triage roadmaps be created in clinics. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

CardiovascularEmergency departmentIntensive care unitNurseTriage decision-making

Identifiers

PMID40730982
PMCPMC12305959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.