ArticleClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2026
An interpretable machine learning model for preoperative prediction of renal mass malignancy.
Article in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Unveiling the Diagnostic Value and Potential Therapeutic Targets of Phenylalanine Metabolism in Pancreatic Cancer via Integrated Multi-Omics and Machine Learning.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo develop and validate a predictive model for distinguishing benign and malignant renal masses using machine learning (ML) algorithms.
methodsWe analyzed data from 1084 patients diagnosed with renal masses between June 2020 and November 2023. Patients were randomly divided into training and validation cohorts at an 8:2 ratio. Seven ML algorithms were employed to construct prediction models for malignant tumors. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used as the primary evaluation metric to identify the best model. Comprehensive model evaluation included AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and other performance indicators, with validation on an independent cohort. The SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) algorithm was applied to calculate and visualize feature importance.
resultsEight variables were included in the final model: gender, cystic/solid nature of the mass, maximum mass diameter, uric acid levels, endogenous creatinine clearance, albumin, albumin-to-globulin ratio, and direct/total bilirubin. Among the seven ML models, the Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT) model performed best, achieving an AUC of 0.88 (95% CI 0.82-0.95), accuracy of 0.80, sensitivity of 0.82, and specificity of 0.79 in the validation cohort. The SHAP algorithm revealed that the cystic/solid nature of the mass was the most significant factor influencing the model's predictions. A publicly accessible web application was developed to facilitate patients.
conclusionsThe GBDT model demonstrates high overall effectiveness and offers substantial support for the clinical differentiation of benign and malignant renal masses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40730913What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.