Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40730913›Full record

ArticleClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2026

An interpretable machine learning model for preoperative prediction of renal mass malignancy.

Zuheng Wang, Xing He, Hanyang Ou, Xiao Li, Chunmeng Wei, Rongbin Zhou, Zequn Su, Junhao Mi, Wenhao Lu, Fubo Wang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Unveiling the Diagnostic Value and Potential Therapeutic Targets of Phenylalanine Metabolism in Pancreatic Cancer via Integrated Multi-Omics and Machine Learning.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Zuheng Wang *Department of Urology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Guangxi Medical University, No. 22, Shuangyong Road, Qingxiu District, Nanning, 530021, Guangxi, China.
Xing He *Outpatient Department, Qingdao Special Servicemen Recuperation Center of PLA Navy, Qingdao, 266071, Shandong, China.
Hanyang Ou *Department of Urology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Guangxi Medical University, No. 22, Shuangyong Road, Qingxiu District, Nanning, 530021, Guangxi, China.
Xiao LiSchool of Life Sciences, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, 530021, Guangxi, China.
Chunmeng WeiDepartment of Urology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Guangxi Medical University, No. 22, Shuangyong Road, Qingxiu District, Nanning, 530021, Guangxi, China.
Rongbin ZhouDepartment of Urology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Guangxi Medical University, No. 22, Shuangyong Road, Qingxiu District, Nanning, 530021, Guangxi, China.
Zequn SuDepartment of Urology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Guangxi Medical University, No. 22, Shuangyong Road, Qingxiu District, Nanning, 530021, Guangxi, China.
Junhao MiDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Liuzhou Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital, Liuzhou, 545001, Guangxi, China.
Wenhao LuDepartment of Urology, Guangxi Hospital Division of the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Nanning, 530022, Guangxi, China. lwh950316@126.com.
Fubo WangDepartment of Urology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Guangxi Medical University, No. 22, Shuangyong Road, Qingxiu District, Nanning, 530021, Guangxi, China. wangfubo@gxmu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2209-9932

Funding

Guangxi Medical University 2023GXNSFFA026003National Natural Science Foundation of China 82372828
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo develop and validate a predictive model for distinguishing benign and malignant renal masses using machine learning (ML) algorithms.

methodsWe analyzed data from 1084 patients diagnosed with renal masses between June 2020 and November 2023. Patients were randomly divided into training and validation cohorts at an 8:2 ratio. Seven ML algorithms were employed to construct prediction models for malignant tumors. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used as the primary evaluation metric to identify the best model. Comprehensive model evaluation included AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and other performance indicators, with validation on an independent cohort. The SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) algorithm was applied to calculate and visualize feature importance.

resultsEight variables were included in the final model: gender, cystic/solid nature of the mass, maximum mass diameter, uric acid levels, endogenous creatinine clearance, albumin, albumin-to-globulin ratio, and direct/total bilirubin. Among the seven ML models, the Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT) model performed best, achieving an AUC of 0.88 (95% CI 0.82-0.95), accuracy of 0.80, sensitivity of 0.82, and specificity of 0.79 in the validation cohort. The SHAP algorithm revealed that the cystic/solid nature of the mass was the most significant factor influencing the model's predictions. A publicly accessible web application was developed to facilitate patients.

conclusionsThe GBDT model demonstrates high overall effectiveness and offers substantial support for the clinical differentiation of benign and malignant renal masses.

Indexed as

Kidney NeoplasmsMachine LearningAdultAgedAlgorithmsArea Under CurveDecision TreesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPreoperative PeriodRetrospective StudiesROC CurveMachine learningPredictive modelRenal cell carcinomaRenal mass

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.