ArticleNPJ precision oncology2025
Comprehensive identification of NRG1 fusions in 25,203 patients with solid tumors.
Article in NPJ precision oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy and Tolerability of Zenocutuzumab in AdvancedJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2026Trial
- NRG1 fusions in non-small cell lung cancer: biology, diagnostics, and emerging HER2/HER3 therapies-a narrative review.Translational lung cancer research · 2026Review
- Histopathologic, molecular, and clinical associations of fusion-positive gastrointestinal carcinomas.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
- Structure, mechanism and clinical relevance of NRG1 fusions in cancer.Journal of biomedical science · 2026Review
- Review
- COLEC12high tumor-associated macrophages orchestrate lenvatinib resistance and cancer stemness in hepatocellular carcinoma via paracrine NRG1-HER2/HER3 signaling.Clinical and molecular hepatology · 2026Article
- Review
- Molecular Pathology of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.Cancers · 2025Review
- Targeting Oncogenic Gene Fusions in Lung Cancer.Cancer journal (Sudbury, Mass.)Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
NRG1 fusion is an emerging oncogenic driver, and the FDA has approved drugs for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer associated with NRG1 fusions. This study retrospectively analyzed data from 25,203 patients with solid tumors who underwent next-generation sequencing (NGS) and identified 49 patients with NRG1 fusions. The mutation profiles and actionable therapeutic targets were analyzed among patients with fusions. In this study, 0.2% (49/25,203) of patients harbored NRG1 fusions. The frequencies of NRG1 fusions across various cancer types were as follows: prostate cancer, 0.65%; breast cancer, 0.47%; lung cancer, 0.29%; esophageal cancer, 0.25%; colorectal cancer, 0.17%; gastric cancer, 0.13%; pancreatic cancer, 0.11%; and hepatocellular carcinoma, 0.05%). A total of 36 fusion partners were detected, among which CD74 was predominant, accounting for 29.3% of cases. Patients with NRG1 fusions presented a greater frequency of FGFR1 mutations and RET fusions, compared with non-NRG1 fusion patients. Most lung cancer and colorectal cancer patients with NRG1 fusions harbored FDA-approved or potential drug targets, whereas those diagnosed with breast cancer harbored fewer such targets. NRG1 fusion-related drugs can provide additional treatment options. Our study expands the NRG1 fusion gene landscape and provides a valuable reference for the comprehensive treatment of patients with NRG1 fusions.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.