ReviewNature reviews. Neurology2025
Dementia research in low-income and middle-income countries - a view from Latin America.
Review in Nature reviews. Neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Plasma proteomic profiles of Alzheimer's disease and neurodegeneration in African cohorts.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Bibliometric analysis of Alzheimer's and dementia research in Latin America.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Article
- Normative cognitive data and psychometric validation of the 10/66 harmonized assessment protocol in Latin American.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Article
- The incidence of dementia in populations around the globe.Current opinion in psychiatry · 2026Review
- An international cross-sectional study of dementia researchers' own perspectives on patient and public involvement.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The ICN-UN Battery: A Machine Learning-Optimized Tool for Expeditious Alzheimer's Disease Diagnosis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dementia research, and research in general, has historically been scarce in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). However, a high burden of dementia is faced by these regions, with a higher prevalence compared with high-income countries, worsened by low control of modifiable risk factors, poverty, low levels of education and limited access to care. Researchers in LMICs face many challenges owing to a lack of funding, scarce resources and equipment and brain drain. However, LMICs also offer opportunities because of their large urban populations and ethnic and cultural diversity. In recent years, interactions between researchers from high-income countries and LMICs have increased, but have largely followed a neocolonial model with little benefit for LMIC researchers. The time has come to address the north-south inequality with collaborative models that can help to reverse this reality. In this Review, we outline the challenges faced by dementia researchers in LMICs and propose a win-win model to improve and develop research in LMICs that includes regional and international collaborations, international fundraising and the democratization of science. This approach will enable LMIC researchers not only to obtain data and samples for research but also to build local capacity and ultimately improve dementia care for populations in LMICs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40730880What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.