Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40730880›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Neurology2025

Dementia research in low-income and middle-income countries - a view from Latin America.

Ricardo F Allegri

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Bibliometric analysis of Alzheimer's and dementia research in Latin America.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ricardo F AllegriDepartment of Cognitive Neurology, Instituto Neurológico Fleni, Buenos Aires, Argentina. rallegri@fleni.org.ar.ORCID 0000-0001-7166-1234

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dementia research, and research in general, has historically been scarce in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). However, a high burden of dementia is faced by these regions, with a higher prevalence compared with high-income countries, worsened by low control of modifiable risk factors, poverty, low levels of education and limited access to care. Researchers in LMICs face many challenges owing to a lack of funding, scarce resources and equipment and brain drain. However, LMICs also offer opportunities because of their large urban populations and ethnic and cultural diversity. In recent years, interactions between researchers from high-income countries and LMICs have increased, but have largely followed a neocolonial model with little benefit for LMIC researchers. The time has come to address the north-south inequality with collaborative models that can help to reverse this reality. In this Review, we outline the challenges faced by dementia researchers in LMICs and propose a win-win model to improve and develop research in LMICs that includes regional and international collaborations, international fundraising and the democratization of science. This approach will enable LMIC researchers not only to obtain data and samples for research but also to build local capacity and ultimately improve dementia care for populations in LMICs.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchDementiaDeveloping CountriesHumansLatin AmericaPoverty

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.