ArticleScientific reports2025
Nondestructive freshness recognition of chicken breast meat based on deep learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI-Driven Nondestructive Measurement Technologies for Meat Quality and Safety: A Review.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Precise Recognition of Adulterated Sliced Mutton Using Machine Vision on Mobile Phone Images.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Identifying chicken breast freshness is an important component of poultry food safety. Traditional methods for chicken breast freshness recognition suffer from issues such as high cost, difficulty in recognition, and low efficiency. In this study, the YOLOv8n_CA_DSC3 algorithm is employed for non-destructive recognition of chicken breast freshness. Specifically, chicken breast samples under different lighting intensities, densities, sampling angles, etc., were collected. Based on the total microbial count (TAC), coliform count (ANC), and pH value of the samples, the freshness of chicken breast is classified into 7 levels: fresh meat, slightly fresh meat 1, slightly fresh meat 2, slightly fresh meat 3, spoiled meat 1, spoiled meat 2, and spoiled meat 3. The dataset was augmented with eight types of data enhancement, resulting in 34,380 samples. The CONV convolutional layers were replaced with the deformable convolution DCNv3 modules to improve network efficiency and key feature extraction of chicken breast through long-range dependencies, adaptive spatial aggregation, and sparse sampling, thereby enhancing algorithm generalization performance. The introduction of the CA attention mechanism module enhances feature fusion between multiple channels and long-distance high-level and low-level data dependencies. Experimental results show that in the improved algorithm, YOLOv8n_CA_DSC3 achieves suboptimal recall rate but optimal precision, average precision at IoU = 0.5, and average precision at IoU = 0.5:0.95. The accuracy of chicken breast freshness recognition is 95.6%, average precision at IoU = 0.5 is 97.5%, and average precision at IoU = 0.5:0.95 is 77.5%, representing improvements of 5.3%, 5.1%, and 6.1%, respectively, compared to the original YOLOv8n. In conclusion, the YOLOv8n_CA_DSC3 algorithm demonstrates good performance in feature extraction and integration of upper and lower layer information for chicken breast freshness, exhibiting high robustness and providing technical support for non-destructive recognition of chicken breast freshness and food safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.