ArticleScientific reports2025
The prognostic importance of neuronatin positivity as immunohistochemical in patients with lung adenocarcinoma in the development of brain metastasis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To search the prognostic significance of the neuronatin (NNAT) protein diagnosed with lung adenocarcinoma in the occurence of brain metastasis. Sixty-six of 200 patients diagnosed with lung adenocarcinoma who received radiotherapy (RT) between 2014 and 2017 were included in the study. A total of 66 patients, 33 (50%) with brain pathology and 33 (50%) with lung pathology, were analyzed retrospectively. Furthermore NNAT-immune-reactivity score (IRS) and nuclear positivity were analyzed in terms of pathological factors. In 33 cases where primary tumor pathology was studied, a statistically borderline significant effect was found for the N stage and a statistically significant effect on overall survival (OS) for nuclear positivity. While OS was 7.6 months in nucleus positively stained (PNS) cases, it was 24.4 months in negatively stained (NNS) cases. While the survival of NNAT-IRS positive cases without cranial metastasis was 20.7 months, the survival of the negative group without cranial metastasis was 61.2 months. The survival of cases with PNS without cranial metastasis was 7.1 months, while the survival of cases with NNS results without cranial metastasis was 52.1 months. In cases where intracranial pathologies, the number of intracranial metastases and the presence of extracranial metastases were found to be statistically significant independent factors (p < 0.001, p < 0.001). With NNAT study in initial pathological tissues of patients diagnosed with lung adenocarcinoma, especially nuclear positivity and NNAT-IRS positivity, a strong prediction can be made about the occurrence of brain metastasis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.