ArticleScientific reports2025
Involvement of hypoxia-inducible factor1-alpha in the protective effect of rivaroxaban against testicular ischemia-reperfusion in rats.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Exosomes Ameliorates Testicular injury to improve spermatogenic disorder through PRDX1/TRAF6/TGFβ signaling pathway.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2026Article
- Contribution and Regulation of HIF-1α in Testicular Injury Induced by Diabetes Mellitus.Biomolecules · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigated the protective effects of Rivaroxaban (RVX) against testicular ischemia-reperfusion (IR) injury in rats with a secondary aim of studying the involvement of hypoxia-inducible factor1-alpha testicular protection against ischemic insults. Twenty-four male rats were divided into four groups: sham control, testicular IR, and two RVX treatment groups (7 and 14 mg/kg) administered for one week prior to IR. Testicular IR led to significant impairment in testicular function, evidenced by an 86.5% reduction in testosterone levels and marked oxidative stress with an 189.3% increase in malondialdehyde (MDA). IR injury also triggered substantial elevations in apoptotic markers (271% increase in Bax (Bcl2-associated X protein) and 65.9% decrease in BCL2 (B-cell lymphoma 2), and inflammatory mediators (285.7% increase in NFκB (nuclear factor-kappa B). Additionally, angiogenic markers showed dramatic increases, with VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) and HIF-1 (Hypoxia inducible factor-1) rising by 431.8% and 519%, respectively. RVX treatment demonstrated dose-dependent protective effects, with the 14 mg/kg dose showing superior outcomes compared to 7 mg/kg. The higher dose significantly improved hormonal function (486.8% increase in testosterone), reduced oxidative stress (51.8% reduction in MDA), modulated apoptotic markers (68.3% decrease in BAX, 159.1% increase in BCL2), and normalized angiogenic factors (71.8% reduction in HIF-1). In conclusion, RVX demonstrated significant therapeutic potential in protecting against testicular IR injury, with the 14 mg/kg dose showing optimal protective effects. Reduction in HIF-1α and VEGF protein expression mediated RVX's anti-oxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anti-apoptotic effect in rats subjected to testicular IR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.