Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40730825›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of epidemiology2025

Application of the actor-partner interdependence model to understand COVID-19 vaccine decision-making among US adolescents and their parents.

Annette K Regan, Marie-Claude Couture, Timothy Callaghan, Brianna Agnew, Jillian Baker, Onyebuchi A Arah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of epidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Annette K ReganDepartment of Research & Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3879-6193
Marie-Claude CoutureSchool of Nursing and Health Professions, University of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4454-3499
Timothy CallaghanDepartment of Health Law, Policy, and Management, Boston University, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9056-9123
Brianna AgnewSchool of Nursing and Health Professions, University of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Jillian BakerCenter for Parent-Teen Communication, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3089-3810
Onyebuchi A ArahDepartment of Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9067-1697

Funding

Scientific and Technical CoreP2CHD041022 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Martha Jane Bailey · 2016 to 2026
$6.9M
Evaluating Teen-Parent Dynamics in Adolescent COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance and UptakeR21HD109536 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF SAN FRANCISCO · PI REGAN, ANNETTE KARENA · 2022 to 2023
$367k
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development of the National Institutes of Health R21HD109536NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD041022NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD109536NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although adolescents play an important role in their medical decisions, including vaccination, few studies have considered their perceptions or role in vaccine decision-making. We apply the Actor-Partner Interdependence Model to understand actor (adolescent) and partner (parent) influences of vaccine hesitancy on the decision to vaccinate adolescents. We conducted a nationally representative survey of adolescents aged 12-17 years old and their parents (n = 721 dyads). Parents and adolescents completed separate online surveys measuring their vaccine hesitancy and intent to receive future doses of COVID-19 vaccine. We used structural equation modeling to estimate the association between vaccine hesitancy and adolescent vaccination among actors and partners using odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs. We identified a couple-oriented pattern in COVID-19 vaccine decision-making, with significant "actor effects" and "partner effects" on adolescent vaccination. Each unit increase in adolescent vaccine hesitancy was associated with 14% lower odds of adolescent vaccination (OR 0.86 [95% CI, 0.82-0.91]). For each unit increase in vaccine hesitancy among parents, the odds of adolescent vaccination decreased by 6% (OR 0.94 [95% CI, 0.91-0.98]). These findings suggest that vaccine promotion efforts should address vaccine hesitancy in adolescents in addition to their parents.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesDecision MakingParentsVaccinationVaccination HesitancyAdolescentAdultChildFemaleHumansMaleSARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesCOVID-19 Vaccinesadolescenceadolescent healthCOVID-19vaccine decision-makingvaccine hesitancyvaccines

Identifiers

PMID40730825
PMCPMC12634106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.