ArticleNature communications2025
Simulations and active learning enable efficient identification of an experimentally-validated broad coronavirus inhibitor.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in neuropsychiatric drug discovery: current challenges and future directions.Translational psychiatry · 2026Review
- Integrative immunoinformatics and structural modeling for the rational design of a multi-epitope vaccine candidate against human cytomegalovirus.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Lock out: targeting TMPRSS2 to block influenza and coronaviruses.Journal of virology · 2026Review
- From Algorithms to Assets: A Comprehensive Review of AI's Role in Preclinical Drug Discovery and the Hurdles to Clinical Translation.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Computer-aided drug discovery: historical foundations, practical AI tools, and emerging ethical considerations.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Drug screening resembles finding a needle in a haystack: identifying a few effective inhibitors from a large pool of potential drugs. Large experimental screens are expensive and time-consuming, while virtual screening trades off computational efficiency and experimental correlation. Here we develop a framework that combines molecular dynamics (MD) simulations with active learning. Two components drastically reduce the number of candidates needing experimental testing to less than 20: (1) a target-specific score that evaluates target inhibition and (2) extensive MD simulations to generate a receptor ensemble. The active learning approach reduces the number of compounds requiring experimental testing to less than 10 and cuts computational costs by ∼29-fold. Using this framework, we discovered BMS-262084 as a potent inhibitor of TMPRSS2 (IC50 = 1.82 nM). Cell-based experiments confirmed BMS-262084's efficacy in blocking entry of various SARS-CoV-2 variants and other coronaviruses. The identified inhibitor holds promise for treating viral and other diseases involving TMPRSS2.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.