ArticleCardiovascular and interventional radiology2025
Outcomes of Percutaneous Cryoablation in Aneurysmal Bone Cysts: A Clinical and Imaging Analysis.
Article in Cardiovascular and interventional radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Minimally Invasive Treatment of Aneurysmal Bone Cysts Utilizing a Modified Sclerograft Technique.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2026Article
- Comment on "Outcomes of Percutaneous Cryoablation in Aneurysmal Bone Cysts: A Clinical and Imaging Analysis".Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the clinical and imaging outcomes of percutaneous cryoablation as a minimally invasive alternative for ABCs in both treatment-naïve patients and those with prior treatment failures. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this retrospective analysis, 41 patients (mean age 13.6 years) with imaging- or biopsy-confirmed ABCs underwent 80 cryoablation procedures between December 2016 and November 2024. Procedures were performed under general anesthesia using real-time ultrasound, fluoroscopy, and CT guidance. A standard freeze-thaw-freeze protocol was applied, with adjustments for larger lesions and proximity to critical structures. Post-procedure monitoring included short-term observation followed by scheduled clinical evaluations and MRI scans at 3, 6, and 12 months. Clinical response was graded on a three-point scale (no, partial, and complete response), while imaging response was based on the percentage of lesion fibrosis.
resultsA complete clinical response was achieved in 78% of patients after a mean of 4.7 months, and a complete imaging response (> 75% fibrosis) in 78% after 16.4 months. Time to clinical response was similar between treatment-naïve (4.4 months) and previously treated patients (4.8 months). Mean time to > 75% fibrosis was 12.4 months in treatment-naïve and 17.5 months in previously treated patients. The mean number of procedures per patient was two, and cryoablation proved effective even in 83% of cases with previous treatment failure. Complications included a transient peroneal nerve injury and a wound infection, both managed successfully.
conclusionsPercutaneous cryoablation demonstrates high clinical and radiological success with a favorable safety profile, establishing it as a viable and effective treatment option for ABCs, particularly in recurrent or refractory cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40730711What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.