ArticleNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2025
A biological phenotype of suicide attempt in adolescents with nonsuicidal self-injury: a machine-based learning approach.
Article in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Integrating neurobiological markers to prospectively predict adolescent non-suicidal self-injury and suicide attempts: a machine learning approach.Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Suicide attempts (SA) are a common risk in adolescents with non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI). In the present study, we investigated whether a set of biological markers contributed (above clinical features) to the distinction of adolescents with NSSI and SA from those with NSSI alone using machine-based learning approaches. Female adolescents engaging in NSSI (n = 161) were recruited from our outpatient clinic for risk-taking and self-harming behavior (AtR!Sk). Different machine-based learning models (logistic regression, elastic net regression, random forests, gradient boosted trees) with repeated cross-validation were applied. We tested whether a) the full set of neurobiological markers, b) a reduced set including preselected markers based on existing evidence (CRP, interleukin-6, salivary cortisol, DHEA-S, TSH, dopamine, norepinephrine, ACTH), and c) a model with only depressive symptoms and age could distinguish between the two groups (NSSI + SA vs. NSSI alone). Depressive symptoms and age were included as covariates in the reduced set to account for their potential predictive effects. The reduced set of neurobiological markers showed poor to fair predictive performance (AUC between 0.62 and 0.72) for SA depending on the model. Predictors with the highest predictive value were high DHEA-S (OR = 1.47, 95% CI = 1.04-2.09) and low TSH (OR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.48-0.97). Complex models slightly outperformed simpler ones and feature selection modestly increased predictive performance. The study may suggest a future potential of biomarkers for the assessment of suicide risk among adolescents with NSSI. Further research is needed to replicate these findings longitudinally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.