ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2025
A digital workflow for designing and fabricating a split negative mold of obturator for patients with palatal defects.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Prosthetic rehabilitation remains the predominant strategy for the reconstruction of maxillary defects. However, conventional impression techniques are often cumbersome and uncomfortable for patients, while the limited precision of medical-grade silicone 3D processing presents additional challenges to achieving optimal prosthetic outcomes. This technical note introduces a novel digital workflow for the design and fabrication of split negative molds for obturator prostheses in post-maxillectomy patients, aiming to address both the discomfort associated with traditional impression-taking and the inaccuracies commonly encountered in prosthesis manufacturing. The proposed protocol integrates spiral computed tomography (CT), reverse engineering, and three-dimensional (3D) printing technologies. CT-derived 3D reconstructions were utilized to accurately capture the morphological characteristics of both soft and hard tissues at the defect site. Defect margin delineation and obturator design were performed using Geomagic Studio 2013 software. Subsequently, a stereolithography apparatus (SLA) was employed to fabricate a split negative mold featuring interlocking alignment structures, which facilitated the production of a hollow silicone obturator. This fully digital approach effectively overcomes several limitations inherent in conventional methods, including patient discomfort during impression-taking and the imprecision associated with traditional silicone prosthesis fabrication. The resulting prosthesis demonstrated favorable clinical outcomes, significantly enhancing patient comfort and restoring essential oral functions such as speech, swallowing, and mastication. Importantly, this technique offers particular advantages for patients with limited mouth opening following maxillectomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40730686What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.