Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40730656›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Immunology2026

Manipulation of the nucleotide pool in human, bacterial and plant immunity.

Dina Hochhauser, Rotem Sorek

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. New frontiers in pathogen immunity.Nature immunology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Balancing of immune activation and suppression during phage infection.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. TIR-like NADases act in bacterial immunity and the RNA vault.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dina HochhauserDepartment of Molecular Genetics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.
Rotem SorekDepartment of Molecular Genetics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel. rotem.sorek@weizmann.ac.il.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3872-4982

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cell-autonomous innate immune system is responsible for sensing and mitigating viral infection at the level of individual cells. Many of the mechanisms used by the cell-autonomous innate immune system in eukaryotic cells are ancient and have evolutionary roots in bacterial systems that defend against phage infection. Studies from recent years have shown that modification of the free nucleotide pool is central to many of these conserved immune mechanisms. In this Review, we explain how immune pathways manipulate the available pool of nucleotides to deprive viruses of molecules essential for their replication, how immune proteins chemically modify nucleotides to generate immune signalling molecules, and how cell-autonomous innate immune mechanisms produce altered nucleotides that poison viral replication. We also discuss the mechanisms used by viruses to antagonize nucleotide-based immunity. Finally, we explore the evolutionary logic of using nucleotides as building blocks for immune responses.

Indexed as

BacteriaImmunity, InnateNucleotidesPlant ImmunityPlantsAnimalsHumansSignal TransductionNucleotides

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.