ArticleScientific reports2025
Evaluation for the selection of agricultural spraying drones using p, q-Quasirung orthopair fuzzy logic and multi-criteria methods.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Optimization of UAV Spraying Parameters for Pepper Pest Control Based on Droplet Deposition Characteristics and Multi-Indicator Evaluation.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Drones are increasingly used across various sectors due to their numerous advantages. In agriculture, drones play a critical role in activities like spraying, offering significant benefits in terms of sustainability and efficiency. The growing adoption of agricultural drones has brought about the challenge of selecting the most suitable drones for spraying tasks on agrarian lands. This study aims to address the problem of selecting the most appropriate agricultural drones for spraying purposes. It focuses on identifying critical selection criteria and ranking potential drone alternatives based on these criteria. Comprehensive literature research and expert interviews were conducted to determine the key selection criteria. The SIWEC method, utilizing p, q-Quasirung Orthopair Fuzzy Sets (p, q-QOFS), was developed to ascertain the importance levels of these criteria. Subsequently, alternatives were identified through detailed research on agricultural drones, and the AROMAN method, also employing p, q-QOFS, was proposed to rank the alternatives. Sensitivity analysis was applied to evaluate the robustness of the rankings produced by the integrated fuzzy model. The study found that the most critical criteria for selecting agricultural drones are payload, ease of use, and flight time. Among the alternatives, Alternative 2 was identified as the most preferred option, demonstrating superior alignment with the identified criteria. This research provides a systematic approach for evaluating and selecting agricultural drones for spraying, contributing to more efficient and sustainable agricultural practices. The integrated fuzzy model offers a robust decision-making framework that can be adapted for similar selection problems in other domains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.