Trial reportScientific reports2025
Impact of an intersectoral universal workplace intervention on health related quality of life and wellbeing in a pragmatic cluster randomised trial.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04000035 (Health in Work - a Measure for Increased Coping and Work Inclusion - An Analysis of Effect of Preventive Information Given at the Workplace - Part 1), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Health in Work - a Measure for Increased Coping and Work Inclusion - An Analysis of Effect of Preventive Information Given at the Workplace - Part 1: Quantitative Data Collection
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The intersectoral workplace intervention "health in work" (HIW), developed by the Norwegian healthcare service and labour and welfare administration, targets common musculoskeletal and mental health conditions by addressing both health and work environment factors. This study assessed the effectiveness of HIW on workers' health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and subjective wellbeing (SWB) compared to standard inclusive work measures (IWM). A pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial including 97 workplaces, randomized to either the HIW or IWM intervention over 12 months. HRQoL was measured using the EQ-5D-5L and the EQ-VAS, and SWB by using the satisfaction with life scale and a question on meaningful life. Measurements were taken at baseline, post-intervention period, and at a 12-month follow-up. EQ-5D-5L data were analysed using mixed-effects generalized linear models. No statistically significant difference-in-difference in HRQoL or SWB were found between the HIW and IWM groups at any time point. Participants in both groups reported high baseline levels of HRQoL and SWB. Although HIW did not yield significant improvements or detriments in HRQoL or SWB, this study contributes to addressing the knowledge gap regarding intersectoral collaboration in enhancing work and health. Further research is needed to assess broader outcomes such as healthcare utilisation and sick leave.Trial registration: The trial was prospectively registered with ClinicalTrials.gov on June 24, 2019, under the identifier NCT04000035.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.