ArticleScientific reports2025
Lightweight underwater object detection method based on multi-scale edge information selection.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimization and Deployment of Real-Time On-Orbit Intelligent Interpretation Algorithms for Spaceborne Remote Sensing.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A benchmark for environmental microorganism object detection on EMDS-7.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Energy-Efficient and Adversarially Resilient Underwater Object Detection via Adaptive Vision Transformers.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Underwater object detection is of great significance to marine ecosystems and underwater biodiversity. However, uneven lighting, color distortion, and noise interference in underwater environments severely impact image quality, significantly reducing detection robustness. With limited computational power and storage space, underwater equipment often cannot meet the demands for efficient processing. As a result, the YOLO algorithm has been widely applied in underwater object detection. This paper proposes a lightweight underwater detector, MAW-YOLOv11, based on multi-scale edge information selection. First, dark channel prior is used to estimate the fog concentration in the image, restoring image clarity and enhancing the recognizability of the target. Next, an innovative Multi-Scale Edge Information Select (MSEIS) module is proposed, and based on MSEIS, the C3kMSEIS module is subsequently introduced. These modules are individually incorporated into the C3K2 module of the backbone network, with the aim of extracting features at multiple scales, emphasizing edge information, and efficiently selecting key features that are highly relevant to the target task, thereby improving the model's accuracy in recognizing critical targets. Third, the ADown downsampling structure is employed to significantly reduce computational overhead while maintaining the original precision. Finally, by using the boundary box regression loss WIoUv3 based on the dynamic focusing mechanism as the loss function, the model's attention to low-quality samples is increased, effectively reducing the negative impact of these samples on the model's performance. Experimental results show that on the URPC dataset, the mAP of MAW-YOLOv11 reaches 81.4%, an improvement of 2.1% over YOLOv11, with a parameter count of 2.11M, a reduction of 0.47M compared to YOLOv11. Comparative experiments with other mainstream object detection algorithms validate the effectiveness and superiority of the proposed method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.