ArticleScientific reports2025
Design of a novel robust adaptive fractional-order model predictive controller for boost converter using grey wolf optimization algorithm.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bio-Inspired PSO Optimization of Fuzzy Membership Boundaries and PI Gains for a 48 V Synchronous Boost Converter.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Modified hybrid DC-DC boost converter with high voltage gain for renewable energy integration using GWO-DE parameter optimization.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Boost converters play a crucial role in power electronics but present control challenges due to their non-minimum phase behavior and nonlinear dynamics at high switching frequencies. To address these issues, this work proposes a Fractional-order adaptive Model Predictive Control (FO-MPC) framework incorporating Exponential Regressive Least Squares (ERLS) for system identification. Traditional MPC frameworks often rely on accurate mathematical models, which are difficult to obtain in real-world scenarios. This adaptive modelling approach based on ERLS identification method eliminates the need for precise system models, improving robustness and adaptability under parameter variations. Additionally, a FO derivative term enhances damping, stability, and noise resistance, overcoming conventional MPC limitations. To optimize controller performance, Grey Wolf Optimization (GWO) is employed for fine-tuning FO-MPC parameters, ensuring improved tracking accuracy and disturbance rejection. The proposed FO-MPC is validated through simulations and experimental evaluations using an Arduino DUE-based setup. Comparative studies against PID and FO-PID controllers, also optimized with GWO, confirm the superior performance, stability, and adaptability of the FO-MPC, making it a practical and effective solution for high-performance Boost converter applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.