ArticleScientific reports2025
A patient-centered approach to developing and validating a natural language processing model for extracting patient-reported symptoms.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pain-centered symptom-language co-occurrence networks differ between interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome and fibromyalgia in Reddit patient discourse.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Korean Medical Consultation With Open-Weight Large Language Models: Pilot Comparative Evaluation of Retrieval-Augmented Generation With Metadata Filtering.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Patient-reported symptoms provide valuable insights into patient experiences and can enhance healthcare quality; however, effectively capturing them remains challenging. Although natural language processing (NLP) models have been developed to extract adverse events and symptoms from medical records written by healthcare professionals, limited studies have focused on models designed for patient-generated narratives. This study developed an NLP model to extract patient-reported symptoms from pharmaceutical care records and validated its effectiveness in analyzing diverse patient-generated narratives. The target dataset comprised "Subjective" sections of pharmaceutical care records created by community pharmacists for patients prescribed anticancer drugs. Two annotation guidelines were applied to develop robust ground-truth data, which was used to develop and evaluate a new transformer-based named entity recognition model. Model performance was compared with that of an existing tool for Japanese clinical texts and tested on external patient-generated blog data to evaluate generalizability. The newly developed BERT-CRF model significantly outperformed the existing model, achieving an F1 score > 0.8 on pharmaceutical care records and extracting > 98% of physical symptom entries from patient blogs, with a 20% improvement over the existing tool. These findings highlight the importance of fine-tuning models using patient-specific narrative data to capture nuanced and colloquial symptom expressions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.