Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40730476›Full record

ArticleBJGP open2025

Characteristics of patients with frequent contact with general practice: a retrospective study.

Jesper B Nielsen, Helene S Andersen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJGP open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jesper B NielsenResearch Unit for General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark jbnielsen@health.sdu.dk.
Helene S AndersenResearch Unit for General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFrequent attenders (>11 annual contacts) use more resources than most other patients in general practice.

aimTo study what characterises frequent attenders in relation to age, sex, mode of contact (face to face, email, or phone), and patient contact (GP or GP staff). DESIGN &

settingA retrospective analysis of Danish patient datasets in general practice.

methodWe used patient data from 11 Danish GP clinics and 38 874 patients covering a 12-month period. Bivariate as well as regression analyses of patient data were used.

resultsFrequent attenders exist in all age groups, but with different frequencies. In the age group 55-64 years, 25% of patients were frequent attenders, this increased to 33% in the next age decade from age 65-74 years and reached 48% among those aged ≥75 years. Frequent attenders have a different user pattern related to physical visits, phone consultations, or email consultations than other patients. In their contact to the GP clinic, the frequent attender is relatively more often in contact with the practice staff than a GP compared with other patients.

conclusionWithin our Danish patient population, 22% had >11 annual contacts to their GP clinic. These frequent attenders are in general terms characterised by being female, aged >65 years, having 20 annual contacts to the GP clinic, and having ≥10 diagnoses. For the entire patient population, the GP handles 36% of the patient contacts (64% by other staff members), and this percentage is lowest among frequent attenders. Email contact is used more often among frequent attenders than other patients.

Indexed as

Denmarkfrequent attendergeneral practiceprimary health care

Identifiers

PMID40730476
PMCPMC12728855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.