Observational studyLupus science & medicine2025
Immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura with systemic lupus erythematosus: clinical features and outcome.
Observational study in Lupus science & medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00426686 (ADAMTS13-related Prognostic Factors in Adult and Pediatric Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
ADAMTS13-related Prognostic Factors in Adult and Pediatric Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe association of immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP) and SLE was previously described, but patients with iTTP with coexistent SLE remain poorly characterised.
methodsWe compared the clinical presentation and the outcome of patients with iTTP with coexistent SLE (SLE-iTTP) to an age-sex matched cohort of patients with idiopathic iTTP without SLE.
resultsDuring the study period, 1409 patients with iTTP were recruited in our registry. Of these, 79 (6%) had a prior or concurrent diagnosis of SLE at the time of iTTP diagnosis, and 437 (31%) had detectable ANAs without other clinical features of SLE. When compared with idiopathic iTTP, patients with SLE-iTTP had more severe renal involvement, and cardiac involvement was more prevalent, whereas central nervous system involvement was less common. Patients with SLE-iTTP received more immunosuppressive agents. There was no difference in response categories during the acute phase. During follow-up, SLE-iTTP had superior ADAMTS13 relapse-free survival than idiopathic iTTP. Among patients with ANAs without other clinical features of SLE, 33 (8%) were diagnosed with SLE 27 months (IQR: 7-65 months) following iTTP diagnosis; 32 additional patients (7%) developed another systemic autoimmune disease. No patient from the idiopathic iTTP group developed clinical SLE during follow-up.
conclusionPatients with iTTP are prone to develop autoimmune features, and patients with SLE-iTTP have distinct clinical features and outcome. Relapse-free survival seems better in patients with SLE-iTTP, underscoring the need for tailored management strategies in this population, including a specific follow-up to assess early features suggestive of SLE. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00426686.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.