Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40730360›Full record

ArticleActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2025

Burnout, wellbeing and defensive medical practice in obstetricians and gynecologists in the UK before and after the COVID pandemic: A repeated cross-sectional survey study.

Nina Parker, Nora Falconieri, Harsha Shah, Christoph Lees, Dirk Timmerman, Ben Van Calster, Tom Bourne

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. When doctors falter: Resilience in modern obstetrics and gynecology, a narrative review.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nina ParkerDepartment of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7962-4451
Nora FalconieriDepartment of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Harsha ShahDepartment of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Christoph LeesDepartment of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Dirk TimmermanDepartment of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Ben Van CalsterDepartment of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-1613-7450
Tom BourneDepartment of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1421-6059

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThere is evidence that burnout rates in doctors are high following the COVID pandemic, but with considerable variation across geographical location and specialty. In 2018, we performed a UK-wide survey of obstetrics and gynecology (O&G) doctors, providing baseline data on burnout, wellbeing, and defensive medical practice (DMP) directly before the pandemic. This study aims to determine the prevalence of burnout, poor wellbeing, and DMP in obstetricians and gynecologists after the pandemic, to compare these to pre-pandemic levels, and to explore the relationship between burnout, poor wellbeing, and DMP. MATERIAL AND

methodsThis was a repeated national cross-sectional survey study. Practicing obstetrics and gynecology doctors registered with the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) were eligible to participate. In 2022, an email containing a survey link was sent to 7388 UK doctors registered with the RCOG. The same method and measures were used as in our previous 2018 study. Burnout prevalence was assessed using the Maslach Burnout Inventory Human Services Survey for Medical Personnel (MBI). Wellbeing and DMP were assessed using self-report questionnaires.

resultsThe response rate for the post-pandemic survey was 19% (1400/7388) and 55% (3102/5661) for the pre-pandemic survey. A total of 1114 out of 1400 (80%) met the inclusion criteria and completed the MBI. Burnout criteria were met in 72%, compared with 36% before the pandemic (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 4.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.0 to 5.5). Highest levels were seen in trainees (80%). Thirty-nine percent of doctors reported DMP compared with 13% pre-pandemic. Worse doctor wellbeing was reported across all items; 62% of doctors reported anxiety, 31% depression, and 9% suicidal thoughts compared with 33%, 14%, and 3% pre-pandemic. Burnout was associated with DMP and poor wellbeing, including suicidal thoughts, depression, and anxiety.

conclusionsThis national study suggests high levels of burnout in obstetricians and gynecologists compared with pre-pandemic levels, particularly in trainees. There was a probable decline in wellbeing compared with pre-pandemic levels. Poor wellbeing and DMP were associated with burnout. Burnout interventions to improve doctor wellbeing, quality of care, and patient safety are urgently needed.

Indexed as

Burnout, ProfessionalCOVID-19Defensive MedicineGynecologyObstetricsPhysiciansAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGynecologistsHumansMaleMiddle AgedObstetriciansPandemicsPrevalenceburnoutdefensive practicedoctorsgynecologyobstetricspatient safetywellbeing

Identifiers

PMID40730360
PMCPMC12393996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.