ArticleMedical care2025
Geographic Access to Cancer Care and Breast Cancer Treatment in Low-Income Women.
Article in Medical care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLittle is known about the role of geographic access to oncologists in breast cancer treatment among low-income patients.
methodsUsing Missouri Cancer Registry-Medicaid claims data, we identified Medicaid enrollees aged 18-64 with newly diagnosed breast cancer from 2007 to 2015 (n=3930). Census tract-level geographic access to radiation oncologists (ROs), medical oncologists (MOs), and primary care physicians (PCPs) was quantified using the 2-step floating catchment area approach and categorized into tertiles. Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) of undergoing mastectomy (vs. breast-conserving surgery), utilizing (yes/no), timely initiating (≤90 d post-surgery), and completing radiotherapy and chemotherapy, as well as being adherent to (medication possession ratio ≥80%) and continuing (<90-consecutive day gap) endocrine therapy (ET) in the first year.
resultsCompared with patients in census tracts with the greatest access to ROs, those in census tracts with the lowest access to ROs had higher odds of mastectomy (OR=1.23, 95% CI: 1.02-1.48, Ptrend =0.04), lower odds of radiotherapy completion (OR=0.68, 95% CI: 0.49-0.95, Ptrend =0.02), and similar odds of utilization and timely initiation of radiotherapy. Patients in census tracts with the lowest (vs. highest) access to MOs had comparable odds of utilization and timely initiation of chemotherapy but lower odds of chemotherapy completion (OR=0.71, 95% CI: 0.51-0.97, Ptrend =0.06). Geographic access to MOs and PCPs was unrelated to ET.
conclusionsGeographic access to oncologists was associated with choice of surgery and completion of radiotherapy/chemotherapy for breast cancer among Medicaid enrollees, highlighting the importance of addressing geographic barriers to oncologists to improve their treatment adherence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.