ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2025
Phenology and flower species availability define wild bee communities on river embankments.
Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Phenology and flower species availability define wild bee communities on river embankments.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Linear landscape elements contribute to pollinator conservation, with enhancing floral resources as the most common restoration practice. However, theory predicts that floral resource availability is not always the limiting factor, as other, non-floral resources can become more limiting once enough flowers are available. We currently lack large-scale studies covering a vegetation richness gradient that could reveal the predicted saturation that should occur with floral resource limitation relief. Here, we present a comprehensive analysis of bee communities from 157 dike grasslands covering a flower richness gradient in the Netherlands in relation to vegetation composition and landscape characteristics. We show that wild bee abundance and species richness increased with more flowering plant species present but saturated at low flower species richness. This early saturation suggests that even modest conservation efforts could effectively alleviate floral resource limitation for pollinators, but that further floral resource increase could lead to diminishing returns. Nevertheless, red-listed species occurrence increased with flower species richness without saturating effects and correlated more strongly with landscape-level factors. Additionally, our results highlight the unique conservational value of river embankments for wild bees, as we encountered nearly half (156) of all Dutch bee species, with nearly 10% of individuals belonging to red-listed species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.